Need for care, adversity exposure and perceived stress in clinical and healthy voice-hearers

Objectives - Psychosis, and in particular auditory verbal hallucinations (AVHs), are associated with adversity exposure. However, AVHs also occur in populations with no need for care or distress. - - Aims - This study investigated whether adversity exposure would differentiate clinical and healthy...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Baumeister, David (Author) , Ward, Thomas (Author) , Garety, Philippa (Author) , Jackson, Mike (Author) , Morgan, Craig (Author) , Charalambides, Monica (Author) , Chadwick, Paul (Author) , Howes, Oliver (Author) , Peters, Emmanuelle (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: 2021
In: Psychological medicine
Year: 2021, Volume: 51, Issue: 11, Pages: 1944-1950
ISSN:1469-8978
DOI:10.1017/S0033291720002433
Online Access:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291720002433
Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/psychological-medicine/article/need-for-care-adversity-exposure-and-perceived-stress-in-clinical-and-healthy-voicehearers/2FD6412B0750FF2025A313B471EBB727
Get full text
Author Notes:David Baumeister, Thomas Ward, Philippa Garety, Mike Jackson, Craig Morgan, Monica Charalambides, Paul Chadwick, Oliver Howes and Emmanuelle Peters
Description
Summary:Objectives - Psychosis, and in particular auditory verbal hallucinations (AVHs), are associated with adversity exposure. However, AVHs also occur in populations with no need for care or distress. - - Aims - This study investigated whether adversity exposure would differentiate clinical and healthy voice-hearers within the context of a ‘three-hit’ model of vulnerability and stress exposure. - - Methods - Samples of 57 clinical and 45 healthy voice-hearers were compared on the three ‘hits’: familial risk; adversity exposure in childhood and in adolescence/adulthood. - - Results - Clinical voice-hearers showed greater familial risk than healthy voice-hearers, with more family members with a history of psychosis, but not with other mental disorders. The two groups did not differ in their exposure to adversity in childhood [sexual and non-sexual, victimisation; discrimination and socio-economic status (SES)]. Contrary to expectations, clinical voice-hearers did not differ from healthy voice-hearers in their exposure to victimisation (sexual/non-sexual) and discrimination in adolescence/adulthood, but reported more cannabis and substance misuse, and lower SES. - - Conclusions - The current study found no evidence that clinical and healthy voice-hearers differ in lifetime victimisation exposure, suggesting victimisation may be linked to the emergence of AVHs generally, rather than need-for-care. Familial risk, substance misuse and lower SES may be additional risk factors involved in the emergence of need-for-care and distress.
Item Description:First published online: 20 July 2020
Gesehen am 21.10.2021
Physical Description:Online Resource
ISSN:1469-8978
DOI:10.1017/S0033291720002433