The role of surface-guided radiation therapy for improving patient safety
Emerging data indicates SGRT could improve safety and quality by preventing errors in its capacity as an independent system in the treatment room. The aim of this work is to investigate the utility of SGRT in the context of safety and quality. Three incident learning systems (ILS) were reviewed to c...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article (Journal) |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
26 August 2021
|
| In: |
Radiotherapy and oncology
Year: 2021, Volume: 163, Pages: 229-236 |
| ISSN: | 1879-0887 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.08.008 |
| Online Access: | Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2021.08.008 Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167814021067025 
|
| Author Notes: | Hania Al-Hallaq, Vania Batista, Malin Kügele, Eric Ford, Natalie Viscariello, Juergen Meyer |
| Summary: | Emerging data indicates SGRT could improve safety and quality by preventing errors in its capacity as an independent system in the treatment room. The aim of this work is to investigate the utility of SGRT in the context of safety and quality. Three incident learning systems (ILS) were reviewed to categorize and quantify errors that could have been prevented with SGRT: SAFRON (International Atomic Energy Agency), UW-ILS (University of Washington) and AvIC (Skåne University Hospital). A total of 849/9737 events occurred during the pre-treatment review/verification and treatment stages. Of these, 179 (21%) events were predicted to have been preventable with SGRT. The most common preventable events were wrong isocentre (43%) and incorrect accessories (34%), which appeared at comparable rates among SAFRON and UW-ILS. The proportion of events due to wrong accessories was much smaller in the AvIC ILS, which may be attributable to the mandatory use of SGRT in Sweden. Several case scenarios are presented to demonstrate that SGRT operates as a valuable complement to other quality-improvement tools routinely used in radiotherapy. Cases are noted in which SGRT itself caused incidents. These were mostly related to workflow issues and were of low severity. Severity data indicated that events with the potential to be mitigated by SGRT were of higher severity for all categories except wrong accessories. Improved vendor integration of SGRT systems within the overall workflow could further enhance its clinical utility. SGRT is a valuable tool with the potential to increase patient safety and treatment quality in radiotherapy. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | Gesehen am 24.11.2021 |
| Physical Description: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 1879-0887 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.08.008 |