Stationary concepts for experimental 2 X 2 games: comment

Reinhard Selten and Thorsten Chmura (2008) recently reported laboratory results for completely mixed 2 X 2 games used to compare Nash equilibrium with four other stationary concepts: quantal response equilibrium, action-sampling equilibrium, payoff-sampling equilibrium, and impulse balance equilibri...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Brunner, Christoph (Author) , Camerer, Colin (Author) , Goeree, Jacob K. (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: April 2011
In: American economic review
Year: 2011, Volume: 101, Issue: 2, Pages: 1029-1040
ISSN:1944-7981
DOI:10.1257/aer.101.2.1029
Online Access:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.2.1029
Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/aer.101.2.1029
Get full text
Author Notes:Christoph Brunner, Colin F. Camerer, Jacob K. Goeree
Description
Summary:Reinhard Selten and Thorsten Chmura (2008) recently reported laboratory results for completely mixed 2 X 2 games used to compare Nash equilibrium with four other stationary concepts: quantal response equilibrium, action-sampling equilibrium, payoff-sampling equilibrium, and impulse balance equilibrium. We reanalyze their data, correct some errors, and find that Nash clearly fits worst while the four other concepts perform about equally well. We also report new analysis of other previous experiments that illustrate the importance of the loss aversion hardwired into impulse balance equilibrium: when the other non-Nash concepts are augmented with loss aversion, they outperform impulse balance equilibrium.
Item Description:Gesehen am 24.06.2022
Physical Description:Online Resource
ISSN:1944-7981
DOI:10.1257/aer.101.2.1029