When justice fails: jurisdiction and imprecation in Ancient Egypt and the Near East
In this comparative study of ancient belief and practice, the Egyptian evidence is analysed first, then placed in the wider context of the Near East. It is argued that, while laws and curses are both ways of preventing damage by threatening potential evildoers with punishment, the difference lies in...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article (Journal) |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
October 1992
|
| In: |
The journal of Egyptian archaeology
Year: 1992, Volume: 78, Issue: 1, Pages: 149-162 |
| ISSN: | 2514-0582 |
| DOI: | 10.1177/030751339207800108 |
| Online Access: | Resolving-System, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1177/030751339207800108
|
| Summary: | In this comparative study of ancient belief and practice, the Egyptian evidence is analysed first, then placed in the wider context of the Near East. It is argued that, while laws and curses are both ways of preventing damage by threatening potential evildoers with punishment, the difference lies in the fact that in the one case punishment is to be enforced by social institutions, in the other by divine agents. Curses take over where laws are bound to fail, as when crimes remain undetected and when the law itself is broken or abandoned. The law addresses the potential transgressor, the curse the potential law-changer who may distort or neglect the law. The law protects the social order, the curse protects the law. These points are illustrated by extensive quotation from Egyptian and Near Eastern texts. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | Gesehen am 26.04.2023 |
| Physical Description: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 2514-0582 |
| DOI: | 10.1177/030751339207800108 |