Laparoscopic sigmoid resection for diverticular disease has no advantages over open approach: midterm results of a randomized controlled trial
Elective laparoscopic sigmoid resection (LSR) for symptomatic diverticular disease is supposed to have significant short-term advantages compared to open surgery (open sigmoid resection (OSR)). This opinion is rather based on inferences from trials on colonic resections for malignant diseases or min...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Dokumenttyp: | Article (Journal) |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
16 July 2011
|
| In: |
Langenbeck's archives of surgery
Year: 2011, Jahrgang: 396, Heft: 7, Pages: 973-980 |
| ISSN: | 1435-2451 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s00423-011-0825-4 |
| Online-Zugang: | Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-011-0825-4 |
| Verfasserangaben: | Wieland Raue, V. Paolucci, W. Asperger, R. Albrecht, M.W. Büchler, W. Schwenk, for the LAPDIV-CAMIC Trial Group |
| Zusammenfassung: | Elective laparoscopic sigmoid resection (LSR) for symptomatic diverticular disease is supposed to have significant short-term advantages compared to open surgery (open sigmoid resection (OSR)). This opinion is rather based on inferences from trials on colonic resections for malignant diseases or minor laparoscopic surgery. This randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare quality of life as well as morbidity and clinical outcome after LSR vs. OSR following a midterm follow-up period. |
|---|---|
| Beschreibung: | Gesehen am 12.09.2022 |
| Beschreibung: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 1435-2451 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s00423-011-0825-4 |