Influence of cementing the pin on resistance to fracture in hip resurfacing

Background - Since the introduction of modern hip resurfacing systems, there has been a controversy regarding the fixation of the centering pin in the femoral component. It has been suggested that cementing the pin may increase strength of the femoral neck. This in-vitro analysis investigated the in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Schlegel, Ulf J. (VerfasserIn) , Siewe, Jan Norbert (VerfasserIn) , Bitsch, Rudi G. (VerfasserIn) , Koebke, Juergen (VerfasserIn) , Eysel, Peer (VerfasserIn) , Morlock, Michael (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Article (Journal)
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2011
In: Clinical biomechanics
Year: 2011, Jahrgang: 26, Heft: 2, Pages: 136-140
ISSN:1879-1271
DOI:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.09.008
Online-Zugang:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.09.008
Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268003310002561
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:Ulf J. Schlegel, Jan Siewe, Rudi G. Bitsch, Juergen Koebke, Peer Eysel, Michael M. Morlock
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background - Since the introduction of modern hip resurfacing systems, there has been a controversy regarding the fixation of the centering pin in the femoral component. It has been suggested that cementing the pin may increase strength of the femoral neck. This in-vitro analysis investigated the influence of a cemented, femoral pin on resistance to fracture in the resurfaced hip. - Methods - Five pairs of cadaveric, fresh-frozen femora underwent hip resurfacing (ASR™) using a high viscosity cementing technique. In one side of each pair only the inner surface of the implant was cemented, in the other side, cement was additionally hand-pressurized down the pinhole prior to implantation of the femoral component. Specimen were then mounted on a material testing machine and cyclic loading with increasing load steps was applied until fracture of the femoral neck. - Findings - Fracture load was increased (P=0.013) in the cemented pin group (Median=4200N) when compared with the cementless pin group (Median=2800N). The number of cycles to failure in the group with the cemented pin (Median=8072) was likewise higher (P=0.01) when compared to the group, in which the pin was not cemented (Median=5906). - Interpretation - Cementing the pin may provide additional fixation in hips with low bone mineral density or osteonecrotic lesions, as resistance to fracture could be improved in the presented in-vitro scenario. Although this was shown for a specific hip resurfacing system, this effect might be extrapolated to other, similar implant designs.
Beschreibung:Available online 8 October 2010
Gesehen am 12.10.2022
Beschreibung:Online Resource
ISSN:1879-1271
DOI:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.09.008