Cogito: automated and generic comparison of annotated genomic intervals
Genetic and epigenetic biological studies often combine different types of experiments and multiple conditions. While the corresponding raw and processed data are made available through specialized public databases, the processed files are usually limited to a specific research question. Hence, they...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article (Journal) |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
04 August 2022
|
| In: |
BMC bioinformatics
Year: 2022, Volume: 23, Pages: 1-16 |
| ISSN: | 1471-2105 |
| DOI: | 10.1186/s12859-022-04853-1 |
| Online Access: | Resolving-System, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-022-04853-1 Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://bmcbioinformatics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12859-022-04853-1 
|
| Author Notes: | Annika Bürger, Martin Dugas |
| Summary: | Genetic and epigenetic biological studies often combine different types of experiments and multiple conditions. While the corresponding raw and processed data are made available through specialized public databases, the processed files are usually limited to a specific research question. Hence, they are unsuitable for an unbiased, systematic overview of a complex dataset. However, possible combinations of different sample types and conditions grow exponentially with the amount of sample types and conditions. Therefore the risk to miss a correlation or to overrate an identified correlation should be mitigated in a complex dataset. Since reanalysis of a full study is rarely a viable option, new methods are needed to address these issues systematically, reliably, reproducibly and efficiently. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | Gesehen am 28.10.2022 |
| Physical Description: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 1471-2105 |
| DOI: | 10.1186/s12859-022-04853-1 |