Diagnostic accuracy of the Pain (P), Enjoyment (E), and General activity (G) scale, a three-item questionnaire, for grading the impact of orofacial pain-related dysfunction

Purpose of this study was to examine the discriminative properties of the 3-item Pain (P), Enjoyment (E), and General activity (G) (PEG) questionnaire for grading impact of nondental orofacial pain. Two hundred eighty-six consecutive patients with orofacial pain of nondental origin filled out the PE...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Roldán-Majewski, Carolina (Author) , Broedel, Elias (Author) , von Korff, Michael (Author) , Rammelsberg, Peter (Author) , Schindler, Hans J. (Author) , Giannakopoulos, Nikolaos Nikitas (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: April 2022
In: Pain
Year: 2022, Volume: 163, Issue: 4, Pages: e540-e546
ISSN:1872-6623
DOI:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002406
Online Access:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002406
Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://journals.lww.com/pain/Fulltext/2022/04000/Diagnostic_accuracy_of_the_Pain__P_,_Enjoyment.24.aspx
Get full text
Author Notes:Carolina Roldán-Majewski, Elias Broedel, Michael von Korff, Peter Rammelsberg, Hans Jürgen Schindler, Nikolaos Nikitas Giannakopoulos
Description
Summary:Purpose of this study was to examine the discriminative properties of the 3-item Pain (P), Enjoyment (E), and General activity (G) (PEG) questionnaire for grading impact of nondental orofacial pain. Two hundred eighty-six consecutive patients with orofacial pain of nondental origin filled out the PEG questionnaire and Graded Chronic Pain Scale (GCPS, version 2), Correlation between the PEG and GCPS scores, internal consistency of the PEG, and differences between groups were examined statistically (level of significance: P <= 0.05). The mean (+/- SD) age of the 213 patients (158 female) who were included in the analysis was 43.1 (+/- 16.7) years. Of the sample, 48.8% (n = 104) had some degree of orofacial pain-related disability (mean overall characteristic pain intensity: 51.2 +/- 23.2, average overall PEG score: 4.3 +/- 2.7, and average PHQ-9 score: 8.2 +/- 6.5). No significant differences were found between the sexes for any score. The number of disability points (GCPS) and overall PEG score showed a strong and positive correlation (Spearman rho = 0.77, P < 0.001). The internal consistency of the PEG questionnaire was high (Cronbach alpha = 0.86). Assuming 3 different levels of orofacial pain-related disability (mild, moderate, and severe), we obtained overall accuracy of 69.01%, with high specificity for mild and severe cases. The 3 PEG groups (mild, moderate, or severe) differed from each other significantly regarding their clinical grading according to the GCPS (Kruskal-Wallis, P < 0.001). Analysis of the receiver operating characteristic curve showed that a single cutoff value of 3.8 points in the PEG score yields adequate validity (sensitivity = 0.91 and specificity = 0.78). The proposed 2 cutoff points (upper = 7 and lower = 4) yield low sensitivity for the upper threshold. The 3-item PEG questionnaire is suitable for grading impact of nondental orofacial pain.
Item Description:Gesehen am 13.12.2022
Physical Description:Online Resource
ISSN:1872-6623
DOI:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002406