Ecological momentary assessment: a meta-analysis on designs, samples, and compliance across research fields
Ecological Momentary Assessments (i.e., EMA, repeated assessments in daily life) are widespread in many fields of psychology and related disciplines. Yet, little knowledge exists on how differences in study designs and samples predict study compliance and dropout—two central parameters of data quali...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article (Journal) |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2022
|
| In: |
Assessment
Year: 2022, Volume: 30, Issue: 3, Pages: 825-846 |
| ISSN: | 1552-3489 |
| DOI: | 10.1177/10731911211067538 |
| Online Access: | Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911211067538 Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10731911211067538 
|
| Author Notes: | Cornelia Wrzus and Andreas B. Neubauer |
| Summary: | Ecological Momentary Assessments (i.e., EMA, repeated assessments in daily life) are widespread in many fields of psychology and related disciplines. Yet, little knowledge exists on how differences in study designs and samples predict study compliance and dropout—two central parameters of data quality in (micro-)longitudinal research. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | Gesehen am 20.03.2023 |
| Physical Description: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 1552-3489 |
| DOI: | 10.1177/10731911211067538 |