What future for history dependence in spatial economics?

History (sometimes) matters for the location and sizes of cities and neighborhood segregation patterns within cities. Together with evidence on rapid neighborhood change and self-fulfilling expectations, this implies that nature might not completely determine the spatial structure of the economy. In...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lin, Jeffrey (Author) , Rauch, Ferdinand (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: 19 April 2022
In: Regional science and urban economics
Year: 2022, Volume: 94
ISSN:1879-2308
DOI:10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2020.103628
Online Access:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2020.103628
Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166046220303136
Get full text
Author Notes:Jeffrey Lin, Ferdinand Rauch
Description
Summary:History (sometimes) matters for the location and sizes of cities and neighborhood segregation patterns within cities. Together with evidence on rapid neighborhood change and self-fulfilling expectations, this implies that nature might not completely determine the spatial structure of the economy. Instead, the spatial economy might be characterized by multiple equilibria or multiple steady-state equilibrium paths, where history and expectations can play decisive roles. Better evidence on the conditions under which history matters can help improve theory and policy analysis.
Item Description:Gesehen am 21.03.2023
Physical Description:Online Resource
ISSN:1879-2308
DOI:10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2020.103628