The political challenges of deep decarbonisation: towards a more integrated agenda

Adopting public policies to deliver the ambitious long-term goals of the Paris Agreement will require significant societal commitment. That commitment will eventually emerge from the interaction between policies, publics and politicians. This article has two main aims. First, it reviews the existing...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jordan, Andrew J. (Author) , Lorenzoni, Irene (Author) , Tosun, Jale (Author) , Enguer, Joan (Author) , Geese, Lucas (Author) , Kenny, John (Author) , Levario Saad, Emiliano (Author) , Moore, Brendan (Author) , Schaub, Simon G. (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: 18 March 2022
In: Climate action
Year: 2022, Volume: 1, Pages: 1-12
ISSN:2731-3263
DOI:10.1007/s44168-022-00004-7
Online Access:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44168-022-00004-7
Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://www.nature.com/articles/s44168-022-00004-7
Get full text
Author Notes:Andrew Jordan, Irene Lorenzoni, Jale Tosun, Joan Enguer I Saus, Lucas Geese, John Kenny, Emiliano Levario Saad, Brendan Moore, Simon G. Schaub
Description
Summary:Adopting public policies to deliver the ambitious long-term goals of the Paris Agreement will require significant societal commitment. That commitment will eventually emerge from the interaction between policies, publics and politicians. This article has two main aims. First, it reviews the existing literatures on these three to identify salient research gaps. It finds that existing work has focused on one aspect rather than the dynamic interactions between them all. Second, it sets out a more integrated research agenda that explores the three-way interaction between publics, policies and politicians. It reveals that greater integration is required to understand better the conditions under which different political systems address societal commitment dilemmas. In the absence of greater research integration, there is a risk that policymakers cling to two prominent but partial policy prescriptions: that ‘democracy’ itself is the problem and should be suspended; and that more deliberative forms of democracy are required without explaining how they will co-exist with existing forms.
Item Description:Gesehen am 12.07.2023
Physical Description:Online Resource
ISSN:2731-3263
DOI:10.1007/s44168-022-00004-7