Paper-based and computer-based admission tests for medicine: are they equivalent?

Admission tests are among the most widespread and effective criteria for student selection in medicine in Germany. As such, the Test for Medical Studies (TMS) and the Hamburg Assessment Test for Medicine, Natural Sciences (HAM-Nat) are two major selection instruments assessing applicants’ discipline...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Escher, Malvin (Author) , Weppert, Daniel (Author) , Amelung, Dorothee (Author) , Huelmann, Thorben (Author) , Stegt, Stephan (Author) , Hissbach, Johanna (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: 03 August 2023
In: Frontiers in education
Year: 2023, Volume: 8, Pages: 1-11
ISSN:2504-284X
DOI:10.3389/feduc.2023.1209212
Online Access:Resolving-System, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1209212
Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2023.1209212
Get full text
Author Notes:Malvin Escher, Daniel Weppert, Dorothee Amelung, Thorben Huelmann, Stephan Stegt and Johanna Hissbach
Description
Summary:Admission tests are among the most widespread and effective criteria for student selection in medicine in Germany. As such, the Test for Medical Studies (TMS) and the Hamburg Assessment Test for Medicine, Natural Sciences (HAM-Nat) are two major selection instruments assessing applicants’ discipline-specific knowledge and cognitive abilities. Both are currently administered in a paper-based format and taken by a majority of approximately 40,000 medicine applicants under high-stakes conditions yearly. Computer-based formats have not yet been used in the high-stakes setting, although this format may optimize student selection processes substantially. For an effective transition to computer-based testing, the test formats’ equivalence (i.e., measurement invariance) is an essential prerequisite. The present study examines measurement invariance across test formats for both the TMS and HAM-Nat. Results are derived from a large, representative sample of university applicants in Germany. Measurement invariance was examined via multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis. Analyses demonstrated partial scalar invariance for both admission tests indicating initial evidence of equivalence across test formats. Generalizability of the results is examined, and implications for the transition to computer-based testing are discussed.
Item Description:Gesehen am 25.09.2023
Physical Description:Online Resource
ISSN:2504-284X
DOI:10.3389/feduc.2023.1209212