Direct determination of the magnetic quadrupole contribution to the Lyman-α transition in a hydrogenlike ion
We report the observation of an interference between the electric dipole (E1) and the magnetic quadrupole (M2) amplitudes for the linear polarization of the Ly-α1 (2p3/2→1s1/2) radiation of hydrogenlike uranium. This multipole mixing arises from the coupling of the ion to different multipole compone...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article (Journal) |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
9 December 2010
|
| In: |
Physical review letters
Year: 2010, Volume: 105, Issue: 24, Pages: 1-4 |
| ISSN: | 1079-7114 |
| DOI: | 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.243002 |
| Online Access: | Resolving-System, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.243002 Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.243002 |
| Author Notes: | G. Weber, H. Bräuning, A. Surzhykov, C. Brandau, S. Fritzsche, S. Geyer, S. Hagmann, S. Hess, C. Kozhuharov, R. Märtin, N. Petridis, R. Reuschl, U. Spillmann, S. Trotsenko, D.F.A. Winters, and Th. Stöhlker |
| Summary: | We report the observation of an interference between the electric dipole (E1) and the magnetic quadrupole (M2) amplitudes for the linear polarization of the Ly-α1 (2p3/2→1s1/2) radiation of hydrogenlike uranium. This multipole mixing arises from the coupling of the ion to different multipole components of the radiation field. Our observation indicates a significant depolarization of the Ly-α1 radiation due to the E1−M2 amplitude mixing. It proves that a combined measurement of the linear polarization and of the angular distribution enables a very precise determination of the ratio of the E1 and the M2 transition amplitudes and the corresponding transition rates without any assumptions concerning the population mechanism for the 2p3/2 state. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | Gesehen am 11.10.2023 |
| Physical Description: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 1079-7114 |
| DOI: | 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.243002 |