3D printed removable functional appliances for early orthodontic treatment: possibilities and limitations

The early treatment of certain malocclusions, such as class II division 1, is recommended to decrease the likelihood of upper incisor trauma. However, the lack of skilled technicians and economic constraints prevent the availability of well-known removable functional appliances. The orthodontic prof...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Segnini, Cristiano (Author) , D'Antò, Vincenzo (Author) , Antonio, Nappo (Author) , Roser, Christoph (Author) , Knode, Vanessa (Author) , Björn, Ludwig (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: 16 August 2023
In: Seminars in orthodontics
Year: 2023, Volume: 29, Issue: 2, Pages: 237-242
ISSN:1558-4631
DOI:10.1053/j.sodo.2023.05.005
Online Access:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2023.05.005
Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S107387462300052X
Get full text
Author Notes:Cristiano Segnini, Vincenzo D'Antò, Nappo Antonio, Christoph J. Roser, Vanessa Knode, Ludwig Björn
Description
Summary:The early treatment of certain malocclusions, such as class II division 1, is recommended to decrease the likelihood of upper incisor trauma. However, the lack of skilled technicians and economic constraints prevent the availability of well-known removable functional appliances. The orthodontic profession is undergoing changes, and automation may offer a solution to these challenges. This article discusses the potential for automating the production of two commonly used removable orthodontic appliances. While CAD-CAM systems have streamlined dental manufacturing, 3D printing is a popular option for certain manufacturing processes. However, the adoption of 3D printing for orthodontic devices faces hurdles, such as redesigning devices for this new manufacturing process, material considerations, and necessary certifications. To showcase the potential design and manufacturing process of 3D printed devices that fall under the category of appliances similar in type and style to FR II and Sander II, the article centers on these two widely recognized appliances. As it is currently not possible to replicate all analog features in 3D, it may be appropriate to use a more general name for the FR II and Sander II appliances. In summary, the article examines the potential and limitations of automation in orthodontic appliance manufacturing.
Item Description:Online verfügbar 7 May 2023, Version des Artikels 16 August 2023
Gesehen am 18.10.2023
Physical Description:Online Resource
ISSN:1558-4631
DOI:10.1053/j.sodo.2023.05.005