More than two intuitions: commentary
We consider an underdeveloped feature of De Neys's model. Decisions with multiple intuitions per option are neither trivial to explain nor rare. These decision scenarios are crucial for an assessment of the model's generalizability and adequacy. Besides monitoring absolute differences in i...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article (Journal) Editorial |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
18 July 2023
|
| In: |
Behavioral and brain sciences
Year: 2023, Volume: 46, Pages: ? |
| ISSN: | 1469-1825 |
| DOI: | 10.1017/S0140525X22002965 |
| Online Access: | Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X22002965 Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences/article/more-than-two-intuitions/F1AE3167C590F94F0EA82C207CCCDF07# 
|
| Author Notes: | David J. Grüning, Joachim I. Krueger |
| Summary: | We consider an underdeveloped feature of De Neys's model. Decisions with multiple intuitions per option are neither trivial to explain nor rare. These decision scenarios are crucial for an assessment of the model's generalizability and adequacy. Besides monitoring absolute differences in intuition strength, the mind might add the strengths of intuitions per choice option, leading to competing and testable hypotheses. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | Gesehen am 31.10.2023 |
| Physical Description: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 1469-1825 |
| DOI: | 10.1017/S0140525X22002965 |