More than two intuitions: commentary
We consider an underdeveloped feature of De Neys's model. Decisions with multiple intuitions per option are neither trivial to explain nor rare. These decision scenarios are crucial for an assessment of the model's generalizability and adequacy. Besides monitoring absolute differences in i...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
|---|---|
| Dokumenttyp: | Article (Journal) Editorial |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
18 July 2023
|
| In: |
Behavioral and brain sciences
Year: 2023, Jahrgang: 46, Pages: ? |
| ISSN: | 1469-1825 |
| DOI: | 10.1017/S0140525X22002965 |
| Online-Zugang: | Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X22002965 Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences/article/more-than-two-intuitions/F1AE3167C590F94F0EA82C207CCCDF07# 
|
| Verfasserangaben: | David J. Grüning, Joachim I. Krueger |
| Zusammenfassung: | We consider an underdeveloped feature of De Neys's model. Decisions with multiple intuitions per option are neither trivial to explain nor rare. These decision scenarios are crucial for an assessment of the model's generalizability and adequacy. Besides monitoring absolute differences in intuition strength, the mind might add the strengths of intuitions per choice option, leading to competing and testable hypotheses. |
|---|---|
| Beschreibung: | Gesehen am 31.10.2023 |
| Beschreibung: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 1469-1825 |
| DOI: | 10.1017/S0140525X22002965 |