Advanced testing of the LoT hypothesis by social reasoning
I elaborate on Quilty-Dunn et al.'s integration of the language-of-thought hypothesis in social reasoning by outlining two discrepancies between the experimental paradigms referred to by the authors and the social world: Self-referential projection and deliberate thinking in experiments. Robust...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article (Journal) Editorial |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
28 September 2023
|
| In: |
Behavioral and brain sciences
Year: 2023, Volume: 46, Pages: ? |
| ISSN: | 1469-1825 |
| DOI: | 10.1017/S0140525X2300184X |
| Online Access: | Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X2300184X Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences/article/advanced-testing-of-the-lot-hypothesis-by-social-reasoning/A5A969A2B3204C340233F8D39989A7AD 
|
| Author Notes: | David J. Grüning |
| Summary: | I elaborate on Quilty-Dunn et al.'s integration of the language-of-thought hypothesis in social reasoning by outlining two discrepancies between the experimental paradigms referred to by the authors and the social world: Self-referential projection and deliberate thinking in experiments. Robust tests of the hypothesis in social reasoning should include observational, natural, and cross-cultural approaches. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | Gesehen am 13.11.2023 |
| Physical Description: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 1469-1825 |
| DOI: | 10.1017/S0140525X2300184X |