Adverse events and stroke prevention by interventional left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with low CHA2DS2-VASc score: results from the multicenter German LAARGE registry : original studies

Background Interventional left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is routinely performed in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and contraindications to standard anticoagulation. Aims We investigated its role in patients at low stroke risk, and compared the effectiveness and safety in patie...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fastner, Christian (Author) , Brachmann, Johannes (Author) , Lewalter, Thorsten (Author) , Zeymer, Uwe (Author) , Sievert, Horst (Author) , Ledwoch, Jakob (Author) , Geist, Volker (Author) , Hochadel, Matthias (Author) , Schneider, Steffen (Author) , Senges, Jochen (Author) , Akın, Ibrahim (Author) , Ansari, Uzair (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: June 1, 2022
In: Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions
Year: 2022, Volume: 99, Pages: 2064-2070
ISSN:1522-726X
DOI:10.1002/ccd.30165
Online Access:Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.30165
Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ccd.30165
Get full text
Author Notes:Christian Fastner, Johannes Brachmann, Thorsten Lewalter, Uwe Zeymer, Horst Sievert, Jakob Ledwoch, Volker Geist, Matthias Hochadel, Steffen Schneider, Jochen Senges, Ibrahim Akin, Uzair Ansari
Description
Summary:Background Interventional left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is routinely performed in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and contraindications to standard anticoagulation. Aims We investigated its role in patients at low stroke risk, and compared the effectiveness and safety in patients with low versus high risk. Methods LAARGE is a prospective registry depicting the clinical reality of LAAO. LAAO was conducted with different standard commercial devices, and follow-up period was 1 year. Patients with started procedure and documented CHA2DS2-VASc score were selected from the whole database. Results A total of 638 patients from 38 centers were divided into CHA2DS2-VASc score ≤2, i.e., low-risk group (10.2%), and >2, i.e., high-risk group (89.8%). The latter had a pronounced cardiovascular risk profile and preceding strokes (0% vs. 23.9%; p < 0.001). Implantation success was consistently high (97.6%), frequencies of intrahospital major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (0% vs. 0.5%) and other major complications (4.6% vs. 4.0%) were low (each p = not significant [NS]). Numerous moderate complications were also observed in the low-risk patients (12.3% vs. 9.4%; p = NS). Frequencies of nonfatal strokes (0% vs. 0.7%) and severe bleedings (0% vs. 0.7%) were low (each p = NS). In a specific analysis, patients at very high risk of stroke (i.e., CHA2DS2-VASc score >4) did not have increased rates of complications or nonfatal strokes in the first year after the procedure. Conclusions Low-risk patients had no nonfatal strokes and major bleedings within 1 year after hospital discharge but had unexpectedly high rates of moderate procedural complications. The indication in these patients should be strictly defined based on an individual benefit-risk assessment.
Item Description:First published: 06 April 2022
Gesehen am 16.01.2024
Physical Description:Online Resource
ISSN:1522-726X
DOI:10.1002/ccd.30165