Coram cruce oder cum cruce?: Gerhard Ebelings regulativer Gebrauch der theologia crucis

Gerhard Ebeling appeals centrally to the theology of the cross as regulative. Theology as a whole is to be characterized as theologia crucis; it is “interpretation of the cross.” In taking this approach, Ebeling was standing, at the same time, against a theology dominated by the incarnation or by th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Stoellger, Philipp (Author)
Format: Chapter/Article Conference Paper
Language:German
Published: 2024
In: Christology revised
Year: 2024, Pages: 373-385
DOI:10.1515/9783111340951-021
Online Access:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111340951-021
Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783111340951-021/html
Get full text
Author Notes:Philipp Stoellger
Description
Summary:Gerhard Ebeling appeals centrally to the theology of the cross as regulative. Theology as a whole is to be characterized as theologia crucis; it is “interpretation of the cross.” In taking this approach, Ebeling was standing, at the same time, against a theology dominated by the incarnation or by the resurrection. In conversation with Ebeling, the ‘before the cross’ (coram cruce) must be thought further hermeneutically with regard to its interpretive potential. In the process, Ebeling’s own starting point will be investigated critically and at the same constructively by means of the ‘experience with the death of Jesus.’ Finally, it will be shown that Ebeling introduces the authoritative horizon of understanding of the cross from the standpoint of Easter and operates with a cum cruce rather than a coram cruce. Is it not the case that it is not theology of the cross that is being done here but rather a theology of the resurrection has been made to be the basic figure?
Item Description:Gesehen am 30.01.2024
Physical Description:Online Resource
ISBN:9783111340951
DOI:10.1515/9783111340951-021