Back and front peripersonal space: behavioural and EMG evidence of top-down and bottom-up mechanisms

Previous studies have identified a ‘defensive graded field’ in the peripersonal front space where potential threatening stimuli induce stronger blink responses, mainly modulated by top-down mechanisms, which include various factors, such as proximity to the body, stimulus valence, and social cues. H...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cocchini, Gianna (Author) , Müllensiefen, Daniel (Author) , Platania, Ruggero (Author) , Niglio, Chiara (Author) , Tricomi, Enrica (Author) , Veronelli, Laura (Author) , Judica, Elda (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: January 2024
In: Experimental brain research
Year: 2024, Volume: 242, Issue: 1, Pages: 241-255
ISSN:1432-1106
DOI:10.1007/s00221-023-06740-4
Online Access:Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-023-06740-4
Get full text
Author Notes:Gianna Cocchini, Daniel Müllensiefen, Ruggero Platania, Chiara Niglio, Enrica Tricomi, Laura Veronelli, Elda Judica
Description
Summary:Previous studies have identified a ‘defensive graded field’ in the peripersonal front space where potential threatening stimuli induce stronger blink responses, mainly modulated by top-down mechanisms, which include various factors, such as proximity to the body, stimulus valence, and social cues. However, very little is known about the mechanisms responsible for representation of the back space and the possible role of bottom-up information. By means of acoustic stimuli, we evaluated individuals’ representation for front and back space in an ambiguous environment that offered some degree of uncertainty in terms of both distance (close vs. far) and front-back egocentric location of sound sources. We aimed to consider verbal responses about localization of sound sources and EMG data on blink reflex. Results suggested that stimulus distance evaluations were better explained by subjective front-back discrimination, rather than real position. Moreover, blink response data were also better explained by subjective front-back discrimination. Taken together, these findings suggest that the mechanisms that dictate blink response magnitude might also affect sound localization (possible bottom-up mechanism), probably interacting with top-down mechanisms that modulate stimuli location and distance. These findings are interpreted within the defensive peripersonal framework, suggesting a close relationship between bottom-up and top-down mechanisms on spatial representation.
Item Description:Online veröffentlicht am 25. November 2023
Gesehen am 19.02.2024
Physical Description:Online Resource
ISSN:1432-1106
DOI:10.1007/s00221-023-06740-4