Wedded to prosperity?: informal influence and regional favoritism

We investigate the informal influence of political leaders' spouses on the subnational allocation of foreign aid. Building new worldwide datasets on personal characteristics of political leaders and their spouses as well as on geocoded development aid projects (including new data on 19 Western...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bomprezzi, Pietro (Author) , Dreher, Axel (Author) , Fuchs, Andreas (Author) , Hailer, Teresa (Author) , Kammerlander, Andreas (Author) , Kaplan, Lennart (Author) , Marchesi, Silvia (Author) , Masi, Tania (Author) , Robert, Charlotte (Author) , Unfried, Kerstin (Author)
Format: Book/Monograph Working Paper
Language:English
Published: London Centre for Economic Policy Research 03 March 2024
Series:Discussion paper series / Centre for Economic Policy Research Development economics and political economy DP18878
In: Discussion papers (DP18878)

Subjects:
Online Access:Verlag, Deutschlandweit zugänglich: https://cepr.org/system/files/publication-files/DP18878.pdf
Verlag, Deutschlandweit zugänglich: https://cepr.org/publications/dp18878
Get full text
Author Notes:Pietro Bomprezzi, Axel Dreher, Andreas Fuchs, Teresa Hailer, Andreas Kammerlander, Lennart Kaplan, Silvia Marchesi, Tania Masi, Charlotte Robert and Kerstin Unfried
Description
Summary:We investigate the informal influence of political leaders' spouses on the subnational allocation of foreign aid. Building new worldwide datasets on personal characteristics of political leaders and their spouses as well as on geocoded development aid projects (including new data on 19 Western donors), we examine whether those regions within recipient countries that include the birthplace of leaders' spouses attract more aid during their partners' time in office. Our findings for the 1990-2020 period suggest that regions including the birthplaces of political leaders' spouses receive substantially more aid from European donors, the United States, and China. We find that more aid goes to spousal regions prior to elections and that developmental outcomes deteriorate rather than improve as a consequence. For Western aid but not for China, these results stand in some contrast to those for leader regions themselves. This suggests that aid from Western donors is directed from serving obvious political motives to promoting more hidden ones.
Physical Description:Online Resource