Multiple streams and policy ambiguity

The last decade has seen a proliferation of research bolstering the theoretical and methodological rigor of the Multiple Streams Framework (MSF), one of the most prolific theories of agenda-setting and policy change. This Element sets out to address some of the most prominent criticisms of the theor...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: DeLeo, Rob A. (VerfasserIn) , Zohlnhöfer, Reimut (VerfasserIn) , Zahariadis, Nikolaos (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Book/Monograph
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Cambridge Cambridge University Press 28 February 2024
Schriftenreihe:Cambridge elements. Elements in public policy
DOI:10.1017/9781009397926
Online-Zugang:Resolving-System, lizenzpflichtig: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009397926
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:Rob A. DeLeo, Reimut Zohlnhöfer and Nikolaos Zahariadis
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The last decade has seen a proliferation of research bolstering the theoretical and methodological rigor of the Multiple Streams Framework (MSF), one of the most prolific theories of agenda-setting and policy change. This Element sets out to address some of the most prominent criticisms of the theory, including the lack of empirical research and the inconsistent operationalization of key concepts, by developing the first comprehensive guide for conducting MSF research. It begins by introducing the MSF, including key theoretical constructs and hypotheses. It then presents the most important theoretical extensions of the framework and articulates a series of best practices for operationalizing, measuring, and analyzing MSF concepts. It closes by exploring existing gaps in MSF research and articulating fruitful areas of future research.
Beschreibung:Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 28 Feb 2024)
Gesehen am 04.07.2024
Beschreibung:Online Resource
ISBN:9781009397926
9781009494502
9781009397919
DOI:10.1017/9781009397926