Exploring hematoma expansion shift with recombinant factor VIIa: a pooled analysis of 4 randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND: - Hematoma expansion shift (HES) analysis can be used to assess the biological effect of a hemostatic therapy for intracerebral hemorrhage. In this study, we applied HES analysis to individual patient data from 4 randomized controlled trials evaluating rFVIIa (recombinant factor VIIa) 80...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yogendrakumar, Vignan (Author) , Mayer, Stephan A. (Author) , Steiner, Thorsten (Author) , Broderick, Joseph P. (Author) , Dowlatshahi, Dar (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: Dec 2023
In: Stroke
Year: 2023, Volume: 54, Issue: 12, Pages: 2990-2998
ISSN:1524-4628
DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.043209
Online Access:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.043209
Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.043209
Get full text
Author Notes:Vignan Yogendrakumar, MD, MSc; Stephan A. Mayer, MD; Thorsten Steiner, MD, PhD; Joseph P. Broderick, MD; Dar Dowlatshahi, MD, PhD
Description
Summary:BACKGROUND: - Hematoma expansion shift (HES) analysis can be used to assess the biological effect of a hemostatic therapy for intracerebral hemorrhage. In this study, we applied HES analysis to individual patient data from 4 randomized controlled trials evaluating rFVIIa (recombinant factor VIIa) 80 μg/kg to placebo. - METHODS: - We generated polychotomous strata of HES using absolute growth thresholds (≤0/<6/≥6 mL) and quintiles of percent volume change. The relationship between treatment and HES was assessed using proportional odds models. Differences in subgroups based on baseline volume (≥ or <20 mL), and time from symptom onset to treatment (≤ or >2 hours) were explored with testing for interactions. - RESULTS: - The primary analysis included 721 patients. At 24 hours, 36% (134/369) of rFVIIa-treated patients exhibited no hematoma expansion as compared with 25% of placebo (88/352)-treated patients. Significant expansion (≥6 mL) was reduced by 10% in those treated with rFVIIa-(adjusted common odds ratio [acOR], 0.57 [95% CI, 0.43-0.75]). An examination of percent change similarly showed a shift across the spectrum of expansion (acOR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.47-0.80]). In both groups, mild-to-moderate expansion was observed in 38% to 47% of patients, depending on the threshold used. Differences in absolute HES between the rFVIIa and placebo groups were more pronounced in patients with baseline hemorrhage volumes ≥20 mL (acOR, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.30-0.76] versus <20 mL: acOR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.47-0.95]; Pinteraction=0.02). No treatment interaction in patients treated within 2 or after 2 hours from onset was observed (acOR, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.19-0.91 versus >2 hours: acOR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.44-0.79]; Pinteraction=0.30). - - CONCLUSIONS: - The association between rFVIIa and hematoma growth arrest is most pronounced in patients with larger baseline volumes but is evident across the full spectrum of treated patients.
Item Description:Veröffentlicht am 8. Oktober 2023
Gesehen am 08.04.2024
Physical Description:Online Resource
ISSN:1524-4628
DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.043209