ECP versus ruxolitinib in steroid-refractory acute GVHD - a retrospective study by the EBMT transplant complications working party: original article
Introduction: Extracorporal Photophoresis (ECP) is in clinical use for steroid-refractory and steroid-dependent acute GVHD (SR-aGVHD). Based on recent Phase-III study results, ruxolitinib has become the new standard of care for SR-aGVHD. Our aim was to collect comparative data between ruxolitinib an...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article (Journal) |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
11 December 2023
|
| In: |
Frontiers in immunology
Year: 2023, Volume: 14, Pages: 1-9 |
| ISSN: | 1664-3224 |
| DOI: | 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1283034 |
| Online Access: | Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1283034 Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/immunology/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1283034/full |
| Author Notes: | Olaf Penack, Christophe Peczynski, William Boreland, Jessica Lemaitre, Ksenia Afanasyeva, Brian Kornblit, Manuel Jurado, Carmen Martinez, Annalisa Natale, Jose Antonio Pérez-Simón, Lucia Brunello, Daniele Avenoso, Stefan Klein, Zubeyde Nur Ozkurt, Concha Herrera, Stina Wichert, Patrizia Chiusolo, Eleni Gavriilaki, Grzegorz W. Basak, Hélène Schoemans, Christian Koenecke, Ivan Moiseev and Zinaida Peric |
| Summary: | Introduction: Extracorporal Photophoresis (ECP) is in clinical use for steroid-refractory and steroid-dependent acute GVHD (SR-aGVHD). Based on recent Phase-III study results, ruxolitinib has become the new standard of care for SR-aGVHD. Our aim was to collect comparative data between ruxolitinib and ECP in SR-aGVHD in order to improve the evidence base for clinical decision making. Methods: We asked EBMT centers if they were willing to participate in this study by completing a data form (Med-C) with detailed information on GVHD grading, -therapy, -dosing, -response and complications for each included patient. Results: 31 centers responded positively (14%) and we included all patients receiving alloSCT between 1/2017-7/2019 and treated with ECP or ruxolitinib for SR-aGVHD grades II-IV from these centers. We identified 53 and 40 patients with grades II-IV SR-aGVHD who were treated with ECP and ruxolitinib, respectively. We performed multivariate analyses adjusted on grading and type of SR-aGVHD (steroid dependent vs. refractory). At day+90 after initiation of treatment for SR-aGVHD we found no statistically significant differences in overall response. The odds ratio in the ruxolitinib group to achieve overall response vs. the ECP group was 1.13 (95% CI = [0.41; 3.22], p = 0.81). In line, we detected no statistically significant differences in overall survival, progression-free survival, non-relapse mortality and relapse incidence. Discussion: The clinical significance is limited by the retrospective study design and the current data can’t replace prospective studies on ECP in SR-aGVHD. However, the present results contribute to the accumulating evidence on ECP as an effective treatment option in SR-aGVHD. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | Gesehen am 16.04.2024 |
| Physical Description: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 1664-3224 |
| DOI: | 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1283034 |