Ambivalent appropriations: narrating enmity through the monumental remains of South Asia

How can art objects and architectural remains contribute to an understanding of the dynamics of enmity? And how, in turn, can the study of enmity contribute to sharpening the profile of art history? The paper examines the nexus between enemization and identity construction as it continues to be form...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Juneja, Monica (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: 2023
In: The journal of transcultural studies
Year: 2023, Volume: 14, Issue: 1/2, Pages: 73-95
ISSN:2191-6411
DOI:10.17885/heiup.jts.2023.1-2.24986
Online Access:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.17885/heiup.jts.2023.1-2.24986
Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://heiup.uni-heidelberg.de/journals/transcultural/article/view/24986
Get full text
Author Notes:Monica Juneja
Description
Summary:How can art objects and architectural remains contribute to an understanding of the dynamics of enmity? And how, in turn, can the study of enmity contribute to sharpening the profile of art history? The paper examines the nexus between enemization and identity construction as it continues to be formed around discussions of monumental remains of past empires in South Asia. The partition of the Indian subcontinent, itself a profoundly ambivalent event, effected a division of the national body along a friend/enemy axis. Narratives of enmity that have proliferated within post-colonial India are replete with accounts of a “Muslim invasion” of the subcontinent whose constructions of militant alterity can be read off the material surfaces of monumental remains of pre-modern times. The article examines the practices of usurpation and iconoclasm that accompanied warfare between Turkic armies and North Indian kingdoms to uncover the dynamic of appropriation and emulation that unfolded as buildings were captured, taken apart, and rebuilt by conquerors, who showed an unexpected predilection for the symbolic language and aesthetics of the enemy infidel. Reading a moment of iconoclasm through a transcultural lens reveals it as a crucible of transformation, which infuses its object with a life that oscillates between continuity and novelty.
Item Description:Gesehen am 04.06.2024
Physical Description:Online Resource
ISSN:2191-6411
DOI:10.17885/heiup.jts.2023.1-2.24986