The analysis of partisan differences in advanced democracies: the “independent variable problem” reconsidered

The paper challenges the idea that using governing parties’ policy positions is necessarily desirable in quantitative analyses of partisan differences in public policies. Rather, for some research questions parties’ affiliation with certain party families is the preferable solution. The paper shows...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zohlnhöfer, Reimut (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: 04 June 2023
In: Zeitschrift für vergleichende Politikwissenschaft
Year: 2023, Volume: 17, Issue: 1, Pages: 77-87
ISSN:1865-2654
DOI:10.1007/s12286-023-00568-6
Online Access:Resolving-System, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12286-023-00568-6
Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12286-023-00568-6
Get full text
Author Notes:Reimut Zohlnhöfer
Description
Summary:The paper challenges the idea that using governing parties’ policy positions is necessarily desirable in quantitative analyses of partisan differences in public policies. Rather, for some research questions parties’ affiliation with certain party families is the preferable solution. The paper shows that the use of policy positions instead of party family affiliation shifts the research question from asking whether parties make a difference in public policy to the question whether parties in government do what they promise. This shift can have considerable analytical costs and can potentially blindfold scholars for certain dynamics. Moreover, the use of party family affiliation has less drawbacks than is often claimed even under multidimensional party competition if the simple distinction between left, center and right parties is abandoned and more fine-grained data for various party families are used.
Item Description:Gesehen am 01.08.2024
Physical Description:Online Resource
ISSN:1865-2654
DOI:10.1007/s12286-023-00568-6