When resilience becomes undesirable: a cautionary note
Traditionally, resilience has been viewed as a general positive adaptation to stressors. However, the hallmark of resilience - returning to the previous state following a perturbation - may also have severe downsides, which are often overlooked. Specifically, it may be unrealistic to return to the p...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article (Journal) |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
April 2024
|
| In: |
New ideas in psychology
Year: 2024, Volume: 73, Pages: 1-8 |
| ISSN: | 0732-118X |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101076 |
| Online Access: | Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101076 Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732118X24000047 |
| Author Notes: | Yannick Hill, Margaret Morison, Abbey Westphal, Solène Gerwann, Bernard P. Ricca |
| Summary: | Traditionally, resilience has been viewed as a general positive adaptation to stressors. However, the hallmark of resilience - returning to the previous state following a perturbation - may also have severe downsides, which are often overlooked. Specifically, it may be unrealistic to return to the previous state or resilience may cause a person to become stuck in an undesirable state. In this article, we first call for a more nuanced theoretical conceptualization of resilience. To do so, we draw on insights from dynamical systems theory help to clearly define the role of a stressor and the idealized pathway to adapt to it. Then, we exemplify the potential downsides of resilience in the context of trauma and social adversity, learning, and goal-disengagement. In conclusion, researchers and practitioners should become more cautious with the term resilience and provide nuanced accounts for what they mean to avoid potentially harmful consequences. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | Online verfügbar: 16. Februar 2024 Gesehen am 20.08.2024 |
| Physical Description: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 0732-118X |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101076 |