Baryogenesis in R2-Higgs inflation: the gravitational connection

𝑅2-Higgs inflation stands out as one of the best-fit models of Planck data. Using a covariant formalism for the inflationary dynamics and the production of helical gauge fields, we show that the observed baryon asymmetry of the Universe (BAU) can be obtained when this model is supplemented by a dime...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cado, Yann (Author) , Englert, Christoph (Author) , Modak, Tanmoy (Author) , Quirós, Mariano (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: 15 February 2024
In: Physical review
Year: 2024, Volume: 109, Issue: 4, Pages: 1-22
ISSN:2470-0029
DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.043026
Online Access:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.043026
Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.043026
Get full text
Author Notes:Yann Cado, Christoph Englert, Tanmoy Modak, and Mariano Quirós
Description
Summary:𝑅2-Higgs inflation stands out as one of the best-fit models of Planck data. Using a covariant formalism for the inflationary dynamics and the production of helical gauge fields, we show that the observed baryon asymmetry of the Universe (BAU) can be obtained when this model is supplemented by a dimension-six 𝐶⁢𝑃-violating term ∼(𝑅/Λ2)⁢𝐵𝜇⁢𝜈⁢˜𝐵𝜇⁢𝜈 in the hypercharge sector. At linear order, values of Λ≃2.5×10−5 𝑀P produce, in the 𝑅2-like regime, sufficient helical hypermagnetic fields to create the observed matter-antimatter asymmetry during the electroweak crossover. However, the Schwinger effect of fermion pair production can play a critical role in this context, and that scale is significantly lowered when the backreaction of the fermion fields on the gauge field production is included. In all cases, the helical field configurations can remain robust against washout after the end of inflation.
Item Description:Im Titel ist die Zahl 2 hochgestellt
Gesehen am 21.08.2024
Physical Description:Online Resource
ISSN:2470-0029
DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.043026