Management of patients undergoing CAR-T cell therapy in Germany
Introduction: Chimeric antigen receptor positive T cell (CAR-T cell) treatment became standard therapy for relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies, such as non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and multiple myeloma. Owing to the rapidly progressing field of CAR-T cell therapy and the lack of generally acce...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article (Journal) |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
March 2024
|
| In: |
Oncology research and treatment
Year: 2024, Volume: 47, Issue: 3, Pages: 65-75 |
| ISSN: | 2296-5262 |
| DOI: | 10.1159/000536201 |
| Online Access: | Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1159/000536201 |
| Author Notes: | Olaf Penack, Peter Dreger, Salem Ajib, Francis Ayuk, Ben-Niklas Baermann, Gesine Bug, Oliver Kriege, Madlen Jentzsch, Guido Kobbe, Christian Koenecke, Mathias Lutz, Sonja Martin, Paul-Gerhard Schlegel, Roland Schroers, Bastian von Tresckow, Vladan Vucinic, Marion Subklewe, Wolfgang Bethge, Daniel Wolff |
| Summary: | Introduction: Chimeric antigen receptor positive T cell (CAR-T cell) treatment became standard therapy for relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies, such as non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and multiple myeloma. Owing to the rapidly progressing field of CAR-T cell therapy and the lack of generally accepted treatment guidelines, we hypothesized significant differences between centers in the prevention, diagnosis, and management of short- and long-term complications. Methods: To capture the current CAR-T cell management among German centers to determine the medical need and specific areas for future clinical research, the DAG-HSZT (Deutsche Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Hämatopoetische Stammzelltransplantation und Zelluläre Therapie; German Working Group for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy) performed a survey among 26 German CAR-T cell centers. Results: We received answers from 17 centers (65%). The survey documents the relevance of evidence in the CAR-T cell field with a homogeneity of practice in areas with existing clinical evidence. In contrast, in areas with no - or low quality - clinical evidence, we identified significant variety in management in between the centers: management of cytokine release syndrome, immune effector cell-related neurotoxicity syndrome, IgG substitution, autologous stem cell backups, anti-infective prophylaxis, and vaccinations. Conclusion: The results indicate the urgent need for better harmonization of supportive care in CAR-T cell therapies including clinical research to improve clinical outcome. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | Online veröffentlicht: 10. Januar 2024 Gesehen am 13.09.2024 |
| Physical Description: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 2296-5262 |
| DOI: | 10.1159/000536201 |