Laryngeal mask vs. laryngeal tube trial in paediatric patients (LaMaTuPe): a single-blinded, open-label, randomised-controlled trial

Background: In hypoxemic children with difficult airway, or for minor elective procedures, the use of a supraglottic airway device may be preferred to endotracheal intubation, whether with a laryngeal mask or laryngeal tube. Second-generation laryngeal masks may offer a better safety profile. Whethe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Katzenschlager, Stephan (Author) , Mohr, Stefan (Author) , Kaltschmidt, Nikolai (Author) , Peterstorfer, Franziska (Author) , Weilbacher, Frank (Author) , Günther, Patrick (Author) , Ries, Markus (Author) , Weigand, Markus A. (Author) , Popp, Erik (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: April 2025
In: European journal of emergency medicine
Year: 2025, Volume: 32, Pages: 123-130
ISSN:1473-5695
DOI:10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001178
Online Access:Resolving-System, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001178
Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://journals.lww.com/euro-emergencymed/fulltext/9900/laryngeal_mask_vs__laryngeal_tube_trial_in.149.aspx
Get full text
Author Notes:Stephan Katzenschlager, Stefan Mohr, Nikolai Kaltschmidt, Franziska Peterstorfer, Frank Weilbacher, Patrick Günther, Markus Ries, Markus A. Weigand and Erik Popp
Description
Summary:Background: In hypoxemic children with difficult airway, or for minor elective procedures, the use of a supraglottic airway device may be preferred to endotracheal intubation, whether with a laryngeal mask or laryngeal tube. Second-generation laryngeal masks may offer a better safety profile. Whether they should be preferred to laryngeal tubes is unknown. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of second-generation laryngeal masks and laryngeal tubes in children. - Methods: This randomised-controlled trial was conducted in a single university hospital in children <18 years undergoing elective anaesthesia in urology, minor paediatric surgery and gynaecology. Patients were 1 : 1 randomised to the laryngeal mask or laryngeal tube group. Children were allocated a second-generation laryngeal tube or a second-generation laryngeal mask as the primary airway device. The primary endpoint was insertion time. Secondary endpoints included first-attempt success, overall success and complications, which included hypoxia (SpO2 < 90%), laryngospasm, bronchospasm, aspiration and bleeding. - Results: In total, 135 patients were randomised, with 61 allocated to the laryngeal tube and 74 to the laryngeal mask group, with a median age of 5.4 and 4.9 years, respectively. Median insertion time was significantly longer in the laryngeal tube group (37 vs. 31 s; difference of medians: 6.0 s; 95% confidence interval: 0.0-13.0). The laryngeal tube had a significantly lower first-attempt (41.0%) and overall success rate (45.9%) than the laryngeal mask (90.5% and 97.3%, respectively). Those allocated to the laryngeal tube group had a higher ratio of complications (27.8%) compared to the laryngeal mask group (2.7%). - Conclusion: This randomised-controlled trial reported that in children undergoing elective anaesthesia, the use of a laryngeal tube was associated with a longer insertion time.
Item Description:Online veröffentlicht: 12. September 2024
Gesehen am 16.09.2024
Physical Description:Online Resource
ISSN:1473-5695
DOI:10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001178