A future role for health applications of large language models depends on regulators enforcing safety standards

Among the rapid integration of artificial intelligence in clinical settings, large language models (LLMs), such as Generative Pre-trained Transformer-4, have emerged as multifaceted tools that have potential for health-care delivery, diagnosis, and patient care. However, deployment of LLMs raises su...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Freyer, Oscar (Author) , Wiest, Isabella (Author) , Kather, Jakob Nikolas (Author) , Gilbert, Stephen (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: September 2024
In: The lancet. Digital health
Year: 2024, Volume: 6, Issue: 9, Pages: e662-e672
ISSN:2589-7500
DOI:10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00124-9
Online Access:Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00124-9
Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589750024001249
Get full text
Author Notes:Oscar Freyer, Isabella Catharina Wiest, Jakob Nikolas Kather, Stephen Gilbert
Description
Summary:Among the rapid integration of artificial intelligence in clinical settings, large language models (LLMs), such as Generative Pre-trained Transformer-4, have emerged as multifaceted tools that have potential for health-care delivery, diagnosis, and patient care. However, deployment of LLMs raises substantial regulatory and safety concerns. Due to their high output variability, poor inherent explainability, and the risk of so-called AI hallucinations, LLM-based health-care applications that serve a medical purpose face regulatory challenges for approval as medical devices under US and EU laws, including the recently passed EU Artificial Intelligence Act. Despite unaddressed risks for patients, including misdiagnosis and unverified medical advice, such applications are available on the market. The regulatory ambiguity surrounding these tools creates an urgent need for frameworks that accommodate their unique capabilities and limitations. Alongside the development of these frameworks, existing regulations should be enforced. If regulators fear enforcing the regulations in a market dominated by supply or development by large technology companies, the consequences of layperson harm will force belated action, damaging the potentiality of LLM-based applications for layperson medical advice.
Item Description:Online verfügbar: 21. August 2024
Gesehen am 11.10.2024
Physical Description:Online Resource
ISSN:2589-7500
DOI:10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00124-9