The comparative study of social action: what you must and what you can do to align with a prior speaker

This article makes an empirical and a methodological contribution to the comparative study of action. The empirical contribution is a comparative study of three distinct types of action regularly accomplished with the turn format du meinst x (“you mean/think x”) in German: candidate understandings,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zinken, Jörg (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: 2020
In: Research on language and social interaction
Year: 2020, Volume: 53, Issue: 4, Pages: 443-462
ISSN:1532-7973
DOI:10.1080/08351813.2020.1826764
Online Access:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2020.1826764
Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08351813.2020.1826764
Get full text
Author Notes:Jörg Zinken
Description
Summary:This article makes an empirical and a methodological contribution to the comparative study of action. The empirical contribution is a comparative study of three distinct types of action regularly accomplished with the turn format du meinst x (“you mean/think x”) in German: candidate understandings, formulations of the other’s mind, and requests for a judgment. These empirical materials are the basis for a methodological exploration of different levels of researcher abstraction in the comparative study of action. Two levels are examined: the (coarser) level of conditionally relevant responses (what a response speaker must do to align with the action of the prior turn) and the (finer) level of “full alignment” (what a response speaker can do to align with the action of a prior turn). Both levels of abstraction provide empirically viable and analytically interesting descriptive concepts for the comparative study of action. Data are in German.
Item Description:Gesehen am 24.10.2024
Physical Description:Online Resource
ISSN:1532-7973
DOI:10.1080/08351813.2020.1826764