When time is of the essence: ethical reconsideration of XAI in time-sensitive environments
The objective of explainable artificial intelligence systems designed for clinical decision support (XAI-CDSS) is to enhance physicians’ diagnostic performance, confidence and trust through the implementation of interpretable methods, thus providing for a superior epistemic positioning, a robust fou...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article (Journal) |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2025
|
| In: |
Journal of medical ethics
Year: 2025, Volume: 51, Issue: 8, Pages: 516-520 |
| ISSN: | 1473-4257 |
| DOI: | 10.1136/jme-2024-110046 |
| Online Access: | Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://jme.bmj.com/content/early/2024/09/18/jme-2024-110046 Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2024-110046 Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://jme.bmj.com/content/51/8/516 
|
| Author Notes: | Andreas Wabro, Markus Herrmann, Eva C. Winkler |
| Summary: | The objective of explainable artificial intelligence systems designed for clinical decision support (XAI-CDSS) is to enhance physicians’ diagnostic performance, confidence and trust through the implementation of interpretable methods, thus providing for a superior epistemic positioning, a robust foundation for critical reflection and trustworthiness in times of heightened technological dependence. However, recent studies have revealed shortcomings in achieving these goals, questioning the widespread endorsement of XAI by medical professionals, ethicists and policy-makers alike. Based on a surgical use case, this article challenges generalising calls for XAI-CDSS and emphasises the significance of time-sensitive clinical environments which frequently preclude adequate consideration of system explanations. Therefore, XAI-CDSS may not be able to meet expectations of augmenting clinical decision-making in specific circumstances where time is of the essence. This article, by employing a principled ethical balancing methodology, highlights several fallacies associated with XAI deployment in time-sensitive clinical situations and recommends XAI endorsement only where scientific evidence or stakeholder assessments do not contradict such deployment in specific target settings. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | Online veröffentlicht: 18. September 2024 Gesehen am 09.12.2024 |
| Physical Description: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 1473-4257 |
| DOI: | 10.1136/jme-2024-110046 |