Trading off autonomy and efficiency in choice architectures: self-nudging versus social nudging

To overcome ethical objections to choice architecture interventions, Thaler and Sunstein (2008) suggest asking individuals to set their own nudge autonomously. Our online experiment (n=1080) faithfully implements this idea for social dilemmas where individual and collective interests often diverge a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Diederich, Johannes (Author) , Goeschl, Timo (Author) , Waichman, Israel (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: 2025
In: Journal of economic behavior & organization
Year: 2025, Volume: 229, Pages: 1-18
ISSN:1879-1751
DOI:10.1016/j.jebo.2024.106859
Subjects:
Online Access:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268124004736/pdfft?md5=519df2fd641ef9769a49427e141a44cb&pid=1-s2.0-S0167268124004736-main.pdf
Resolving-System, lizenzpflichtig: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2024.106859
Resolving-System, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2024.106859
Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268124004736?via%3Dihub
Get full text
Author Notes:Johannes Diederich, Timo Goeschl, Israel Waichman
Description
Summary:To overcome ethical objections to choice architecture interventions, Thaler and Sunstein (2008) suggest asking individuals to set their own nudge autonomously. Our online experiment (n=1080) faithfully implements this idea for social dilemmas where individual and collective interests often diverge and social nudges can conflict with autonomy. General-population subjects play a ten-round, ten-day public goods game. Non-participation triggers default contributions. We test three default nudges: An exogenous selfish nudge of zero contribution, an exogenous social nudge of full contribution, and an autonomous self-nudge where subjects select their own default contribution. Their performance is tested under four different information structures. We, first, document default choice under autonomy: Only between three and eight percent of subjects set their own default to either zero or full contribution. Second, autonomy and efficiency conflict: Group-level contributions under self-nudging are consistently lower than under the social nudge, which strictly dominates the selfish nudge. When committed to autonomy, the policy-maker - to maximize efficiency - best combines self-nudging with an information structure with public defaults.
Item Description:Gesehen am 12.03.2025
Online veröffentlicht: 21. Dezember 2024
Physical Description:Online Resource
ISSN:1879-1751
DOI:10.1016/j.jebo.2024.106859