Proposing the DN(C)-model of material evidence for well-calibrated claims about past cultures
Stibbard-Hawkes presents a much-needed case for distinguishing between different types of evidence for cognition in past cultures. However, he does not outline an applicable approach for moving forward in making claims about the cognition of past cultures. We present an initial model for calibrating...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article (Journal) Editorial |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
January 14, 2025
|
| In: |
Behavioral and brain sciences
Year: 2025, Volume: 48, Pages: ? |
| ISSN: | 1469-1825 |
| DOI: | 10.1017/S0140525X24000840 |
| Online Access: | Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X24000840 Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences/article/proposing-the-dncmodel-of-material-evidence-for-wellcalibrated-claims-about-past-cultures/906CE9873D64B233F9FD9281F66B123E 
|
| Author Notes: | David J. Grüning and Lukas J. Grüning |
| Summary: | Stibbard-Hawkes presents a much-needed case for distinguishing between different types of evidence for cognition in past cultures. However, he does not outline an applicable approach for moving forward in making claims about the cognition of past cultures. We present an initial model for calibrating both absolute and comparative claims about past cultures' cognition and other traits. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | Gesehen am 12.03.2025 |
| Physical Description: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 1469-1825 |
| DOI: | 10.1017/S0140525X24000840 |