Direct composite restorations on permanent teeth in the anterior and posterior region - an evidence-based clinical practice guideline - part 1: indications for composite restorations
Purpose: This German S3 clinical practice guideline offers evidence-based recommendations for the use of composite materials in direct restorations of permanent teeth. Outcomes considered were the survival rates and restoration quality and pro-cess quality of the manufacturing process. Part 1 of thi...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Dokumenttyp: | Article (Journal) |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2024
|
| In: |
The journal of adhesive dentistry
Year: 2024, Jahrgang: 26, Heft: 1, Pages: 185-200 |
| ISSN: | 1757-9988 |
| DOI: | 10.3290/j.jad.b5748881 |
| Online-Zugang: | Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.b5748881
|
| Verfasserangaben: | Diana Wolff/Cornelia Frese/Roland Frankenberger/Rainer Haak/Andreas Braun/Norbert Kraemer/Gabriel Krastl/Falk Schwendicke/Esra Kosan/Eva Langowski/Caroline Sekundo and Guideline panel members and methodological consultants |
| Zusammenfassung: | Purpose: This German S3 clinical practice guideline offers evidence-based recommendations for the use of composite materials in direct restorations of permanent teeth. Outcomes considered were the survival rates and restoration quality and pro-cess quality of the manufacturing process. Part 1 of this two-part presentation deals with the indication classes. Materials and Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted by two methodologists using MEDLINE and the Co-chrane Library via the OVID platform, including studies up to December 2021. Six PICO questions were developed to guide the search. Recommendations were formulated by a panel of dental professionals from 20 national societies and organizations based on the collected evidence. Results: Composite materials are a viable option for the direct restoration of cavity Classes I-V and may also be used for restorations with cusp replacement, and tooth shape corrections. In the posterior region, direct composite restorations should be preferred over indirect composite inlays. For Class V restorations, composite materials can be used if adequate contamination control and adhesive technique are ensured. Conclusion: The guideline is the first to provide comprehensive evidence on the use of direct composite materials. However, further long-term clinical studies with comparators such as (modified) glass-ionomer cements are necessary. Regular updates will detail the future scope and limitations of direct composite restorations. |
|---|---|
| Beschreibung: | Online veröffentlicht: 17. September 2024 Gesehen am 16.04.2025 |
| Beschreibung: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 1757-9988 |
| DOI: | 10.3290/j.jad.b5748881 |