Observer variabilities for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease using anatomical and functional testing: the impact of certification
To compare the reproducibility in reporting of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) or cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) by certified readers for CCTA and CMR by the German Society of Cardiology (DGK) versus that by non-certified readers.
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article (Journal) |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
08 May 2025
|
| In: |
Clinical research in cardiology
Year: 2025, Pages: 1-12 |
| ISSN: | 1861-0692 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s00392-025-02661-0 |
| Online Access: | Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-025-02661-0 Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00392-025-02661-0 |
| Author Notes: | Grigorios Korosoglou, Nadine Abanador-Kamper, Christian Tesche, Matthias Renker, Florian André, Loris Weichsel, Michaela Hell, Florian Bönner, Mareike Cramer, Sebastian Kelle, Jeanette Schulz-Menger, Wolfgang Fehske, Andreas Rolf, Norbert Frey, Holger Thiele, Stephan Baldus |
| Summary: | To compare the reproducibility in reporting of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) or cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) by certified readers for CCTA and CMR by the German Society of Cardiology (DGK) versus that by non-certified readers. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | Gesehen am 03.06.2025 |
| Physical Description: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 1861-0692 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s00392-025-02661-0 |