Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in 2020

New insights have emerged from maturing long-term academic and commercial clinical trials regarding optimum management of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Velocity of response has unexpectedly proved less important than hitherto thought, does not predict survival, and is of unclear relevance for trea...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hehlmann, Rüdiger (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: 30 September 2020
In: HemaSphere
Year: 2020, Volume: 4, Issue: 5, Pages: 1-11
ISSN:2572-9241
DOI:10.1097/HS9.0000000000000468
Online Access:Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1097/HS9.0000000000000468
Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1097/HS9.0000000000000468
Get full text
Author Notes:Rüdiger Hehlmann
Description
Summary:New insights have emerged from maturing long-term academic and commercial clinical trials regarding optimum management of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Velocity of response has unexpectedly proved less important than hitherto thought, does not predict survival, and is of unclear relevance for treatment-free remission (TFR). Serious and cumulative toxicity has been observed with tyrosine kinase inhibitors that had been expected to replace imatinib. Generic imatinib has become cost-effective first-line treatment in chronic phase despite chronic low-grade side-effects in many patients. Earlier recognition of end-phase by genetic assessment might improve prospects for blast crisis (BC). TFR has become an important new treatment goal of CML. To reflect this new situation ELN has recently revised and updated its recommendations for treating CML. After a brief review of 175 years of CML history this review will focus on recent developments and on current evidence for treating CML in 2020.
Item Description:Gesehen am 06.06.2020
Physical Description:Online Resource
ISSN:2572-9241
DOI:10.1097/HS9.0000000000000468