Psychosocial interventions for violence exposed youth: a systematic review

Background - Violence exposure (direct, indirect, individual, structural) affects youth mental health. - Objective - We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions in addressing the sequelae of violence exposure on youth (15-24 years old) and evaluate whether moderating factors...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lindert, Jutta U. (Author) , Jakubauskiene, Marija (Author) , Natan, Marta (Author) , Wehrwein, Annette (Author) , Bain, Paul (Author) , Schmahl, Christian (Author) , Kamenov, Kaloyan (Author) , Carta, Mauro (Author) , Cabello, Maria (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: October 2020
In: Child abuse & neglect
Year: 2020, Volume: 108, Pages: 1-15
ISSN:1873-7757
DOI:10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104530
Online Access:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104530
Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014521342030185X
Get full text
Author Notes:Jutta Lindert, Marija Jakubauskiene, Marta Natan, Annette Wehrwein, Paul Bain, Christian Schmahl, Kaloyan Kamenov, Mauro Carta, Maria Cabello
Description
Summary:Background - Violence exposure (direct, indirect, individual, structural) affects youth mental health. - Objective - We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions in addressing the sequelae of violence exposure on youth (15-24 years old) and evaluate whether moderating factors impact intervention effectiveness. - Methods - We systematically searched eight databases and reference lists to retrieve any studies of psychosocial interventions addressing mental health among youth aged 15-25 exposed to violence. We assessed study risk of bias using an adapted version of the Downs and Black’s Risk of Bias Scale. - Results - We identified n = 3077 studies. Sixteen articles representing 14 studies met were included. The studies assessed direct and indirect individual violence exposure at least once. We pooled the data from the 14 studies and evaluated the effects. We estimated an average effect of r+ = 0.57 (RCTs: 95 % CI 0.02-1.13; observational studies: 95 % CI 0.27-86) with some heterogeneity (RCTs: I2 = 78.03, longitudinal studies: I2 = 82.93). The most effective interventions are Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, and Exposure Therapy with an exposure focus. However, due to the small number of studies we are uncertain about benefits of interventions. - Conclusions - No study assessed structural violence. Therefore, studies are needed to evaluate the effects of psychosocial interventions for youth exposed to direct, indirect, individual and structural violence.
Item Description:Online verfügbar: 14. August 2020
Gesehen am 06.08.2025
Physical Description:Online Resource
ISSN:1873-7757
DOI:10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104530