Entanglements of dis:abilities and technologies in public space and life: insights from a mobile and visual methods study including video-based mobile eye-tracking
Technologies are often proposed as means to enhance accessibility, mobility, and autonomy for people with disabilities. This article critically examines such claims and aims to conceptualize and empirically explore the relational entanglements of disabilities and technologies in everyday life, highl...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article (Journal) |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2025
|
| In: |
Annals of the Association of American Geographers
Year: 2025, Pages: 1-20 |
| ISSN: | 1467-8306 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/24694452.2025.2528940 |
| Online Access: | Resolving-System, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2025.2528940
|
| Author Notes: | Tabea Bork-Hüffer, Jan Misera, Johannes Melchert, and Jessica Pykett |
| Summary: | Technologies are often proposed as means to enhance accessibility, mobility, and autonomy for people with disabilities. This article critically examines such claims and aims to conceptualize and empirically explore the relational entanglements of disabilities and technologies in everyday life, highlighting how diverse technologies—intimate, assistive, and infrastructural—can simultaneously enable and constrain accessibility, autonomy, and inclusion. To this end, the article weaves together critical disability studies, digital geographies, and feminist science and technology studies, introducing the concept of dis:abilities to describe the relational, inseparable, fluid, and diverse nature of disabilities and abilities. It develops the notion of relational technological entanglements with dis:abilities and places this in dialogue with emerging scholarship that pursues innovative methodological and empirical approaches to explore entanglements. The article presents findings from a co-productive, mobile and visual research study with disabled people, including video-based mobile eye-tracking. Findings reveal that although technologies play a central role in enabling everyday practices, mobilities, autonomy, and emotional well-being, the participants’ narratives underscore the fragilities, ambiguities, and nonlinearities of relying on a range of technologies. Technological temporalities and ephemeralities can give rise to moments of vulnerability. Moreover, the benefits these technologies offer often come at the cost of significant effort, time, and financial resources. Despite being framed as offering seamless support, their material and visible dimensions can reinforce exclusion, discrimination, and alienation within the dis/ability complex. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | Published online: 13. August 2025 Gesehen am 22.08.2025 |
| Physical Description: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 1467-8306 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/24694452.2025.2528940 |