Two separated worlds: On the preference of influence in life science and biomedical research

We introduced a new metric, “citation enrichment”, to measure country-to-country influence using citation data. This metric evaluates the degree to which a country prefers to cite another country compared to a random citation process. We applied the citation enrichment method to over 12 million publ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gu, Zuguang (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: 21 January 2025
In: Journal of informetrics
Year: 2025, Volume: 19, Issue: 2, Pages: 1-21
ISSN:1751-1577
DOI:10.1016/j.joi.2025.101641
Online Access:Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2025.101641
Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157725000057
Get full text
Author Notes:Zuguang Gu
Description
Summary:We introduced a new metric, “citation enrichment”, to measure country-to-country influence using citation data. This metric evaluates the degree to which a country prefers to cite another country compared to a random citation process. We applied the citation enrichment method to over 12 million publications in the life science and biomedical fields and we have the following key findings: 1) The global scientific landscape is divided into two separated worlds where developed Western countries exhibit an overall mutual under-influence with the rest of the world; 2) Within each world, countries form clusters based on their mutual citation preferences, with these groupings strongly associated with their geographical and cultural proximity; 3) The two worlds exhibit distinct patterns of the influence balance among countries, revealing underlying mechanisms that drive influence dynamics. We have constructed a comprehensive world map of scientific influence which greatly enhances the deep understanding of the international exchange of scientific knowledge. The citation enrichment metric is developed under a well-defined statistical framework and has the potential to be extended into a versatile and powerful tool for bibliometrics and related research fields.
Item Description:Gesehen am 27.08.2025
Physical Description:Online Resource
ISSN:1751-1577
DOI:10.1016/j.joi.2025.101641