Follow-up 18F-FDG PET/CT versus contrast-enhanced CT after ablation of liver metastases of colorectal carcinoma: a cost-effectiveness analysis

Purpose: After a percutaneous ablation of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), follow-up investigations to evaluate potential tumor recurrence are necessary. The aim of this study was to analyze whether a combined 18F-Fluordesoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Schnitzer, Moritz Ludwig (VerfasserIn) , Froelich, Matthias F. (VerfasserIn) , Gassert, Felix (VerfasserIn) , Huber, Thomas (VerfasserIn) , Gresser, Eva Kristina (VerfasserIn) , Schwarze, Vincent (VerfasserIn) , Nörenberg, Dominik (VerfasserIn) , Todica, Andrei Stefan (VerfasserIn) , Rübenthaler, Johannes (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Article (Journal)
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 27 August 2020
In: Cancers
Year: 2020, Jahrgang: 12, Heft: 9, Pages: 1-14
ISSN:2072-6694
DOI:10.3390/cancers12092432
Online-Zugang:Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12092432
Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/12/9/2432
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:Moritz L. Schnitzer, Matthias F. Froelich, Felix G. Gassert, Thomas Huber, Eva Gresser, Vincent Schwarze, Dominik Nörenberg, Andrei Todica and Johannes Rübenthaler

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a2200000 c 4500
001 1944965386
003 DE-627
005 20251205153228.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 251205s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.3390/cancers12092432  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1944965386 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1944965386 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 33  |2 sdnb 
100 1 |a Schnitzer, Moritz Ludwig  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1236365828  |0 (DE-627)1761723464  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Follow-up 18F-FDG PET/CT versus contrast-enhanced CT after ablation of liver metastases of colorectal carcinoma  |b a cost-effectiveness analysis  |c Moritz L. Schnitzer, Matthias F. Froelich, Felix G. Gassert, Thomas Huber, Eva Gresser, Vincent Schwarze, Dominik Nörenberg, Andrei Todica and Johannes Rübenthaler 
246 3 0 |a eighteen 
246 3 3 |a Follow-up 18 F-FDG PET/CT vs. contrast-enhanced CT after ablation of liver metastases of colorectal carcinoma 
264 1 |c 27 August 2020 
300 |b Illustrationen 
300 |a 14 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Gesehen am 05.12.2025 
520 |a Purpose: After a percutaneous ablation of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), follow-up investigations to evaluate potential tumor recurrence are necessary. The aim of this study was to analyze whether a combined 18F-Fluordesoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) scan is cost-effective compared to a contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) scan for detecting local tumor progression. Materials and Methods: A decision model based on Markov simulations that estimated lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) was developed. Model input parameters were obtained from the recent literature. Deterministic sensitivity analysis of diagnostic parameters based on a Monte-Carlo simulation with 30,000 iterations was performed. The willingness-to-pay (WTP) was set to $100,000/QALY. Results: In the base-case scenario, CE-CT resulted in total costs of $28,625.08 and an efficacy of 0.755 QALYs, whereas 18F-FDG PET/CT resulted in total costs of $29,239.97 with an efficacy of 0.767. Therefore, the corresponding incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 18F-FDG PET/CT was $50,338.96 per QALY indicating cost-effectiveness based on the WTP threshold set above. The results were stable in deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Conclusion: Based on our model, 18F-FDG PET/CT can be considered as a cost-effective imaging alternative for follow-up investigations after percutaneous ablation of colorectal liver metastases. 
650 4 |a 18F-FDG PET/CT 
650 4 |a cost-effectiveness 
650 4 |a liver metastases 
650 4 |a nuclear imaging 
650 4 |a oncologic imaging 
700 1 |a Froelich, Matthias F.  |d 1991-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1170833756  |0 (DE-627)1040131557  |0 (DE-576)512678359  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Gassert, Felix  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1218608692  |0 (DE-627)1733991891  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Huber, Thomas  |d 1986-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1217354859  |0 (DE-627)1729178677  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Gresser, Eva Kristina  |d 1988-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1190833689  |0 (DE-627)1669407772  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Schwarze, Vincent  |d 1987-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)106335319X  |0 (DE-627)812328396  |0 (DE-576)422353795  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Nörenberg, Dominik  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1064719996  |0 (DE-627)814432123  |0 (DE-576)424084228  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Todica, Andrei Stefan  |d 1983-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1042953937  |0 (DE-627)769882811  |0 (DE-576)394317246  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Rübenthaler, Johannes  |d 1987-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1064849903  |0 (DE-627)815222009  |0 (DE-576)424189941  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Cancers  |d Basel : MDPI, 2009  |g 12(2020), 9 vom: 27. Aug., Artikel-ID 2432, Seite 1-14  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)614095670  |w (DE-600)2527080-1  |w (DE-576)313958548  |x 2072-6694  |7 nnas  |a Follow-up 18F-FDG PET/CT versus contrast-enhanced CT after ablation of liver metastases of colorectal carcinoma a cost-effectiveness analysis 
773 1 8 |g volume:12  |g year:2020  |g number:9  |g day:27  |g month:08  |g elocationid:2432  |g pages:1-14  |g extent:14  |a Follow-up 18F-FDG PET/CT versus contrast-enhanced CT after ablation of liver metastases of colorectal carcinoma a cost-effectiveness analysis 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12092432  |x Verlag  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext  |7 0 
856 4 0 |u https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/12/9/2432  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext  |7 0 
951 |a AR 
992 |a 20251205 
993 |a Article 
994 |a 2020 
998 |g 1064719996  |a Nörenberg, Dominik  |m 1064719996:Nörenberg, Dominik  |d 60000  |d 62900  |e 60000PN1064719996  |e 62900PN1064719996  |k 0/60000/  |k 1/60000/62900/  |p 7 
998 |g 1217354859  |a Huber, Thomas  |m 1217354859:Huber, Thomas  |d 60000  |d 62900  |e 60000PH1217354859  |e 62900PH1217354859  |k 0/60000/  |k 1/60000/62900/  |p 4 
998 |g 1170833756  |a Froelich, Matthias F.  |m 1170833756:Froelich, Matthias F.  |d 60000  |d 62900  |d 60000  |e 60000PF1170833756  |e 62900PF1170833756  |e 60000PF1170833756  |k 0/60000/  |k 1/60000/62900/  |k 0/60000/  |p 2 
999 |a KXP-PPN1944965386  |e 4823424212 
BIB |a Y 
SER |a journal 
JSO |a {"physDesc":[{"extent":"14 S.","noteIll":"Illustrationen"}],"name":{"displayForm":["Moritz L. Schnitzer, Matthias F. Froelich, Felix G. Gassert, Thomas Huber, Eva Gresser, Vincent Schwarze, Dominik Nörenberg, Andrei Todica and Johannes Rübenthaler"]},"language":["eng"],"type":{"bibl":"article-journal","media":"Online-Ressource"},"origin":[{"dateIssuedDisp":"27 August 2020","dateIssuedKey":"2020"}],"note":["Gesehen am 05.12.2025"],"title":[{"subtitle":"a cost-effectiveness analysis","title_sort":"Follow-up 18F-FDG PET/CT versus contrast-enhanced CT after ablation of liver metastases of colorectal carcinoma","title":"Follow-up 18F-FDG PET/CT versus contrast-enhanced CT after ablation of liver metastases of colorectal carcinoma"}],"id":{"eki":["1944965386"],"doi":["10.3390/cancers12092432"]},"relHost":[{"physDesc":[{"extent":"Online-Ressource"}],"name":{"displayForm":["Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)"]},"part":{"extent":"14","year":"2020","pages":"1-14","text":"12(2020), 9 vom: 27. Aug., Artikel-ID 2432, Seite 1-14","volume":"12","issue":"9"},"origin":[{"publisher":"MDPI","publisherPlace":"Basel","dateIssuedKey":"2009","dateIssuedDisp":"2009-"}],"type":{"bibl":"periodical","media":"Online-Ressource"},"language":["eng"],"disp":"Follow-up 18F-FDG PET/CT versus contrast-enhanced CT after ablation of liver metastases of colorectal carcinoma a cost-effectiveness analysisCancers","note":["Gesehen am 27.05.2020"],"id":{"eki":["614095670"],"zdb":["2527080-1"],"issn":["2072-6694"]},"title":[{"title_sort":"Cancers","title":"Cancers"}],"pubHistory":["1.2009 -"],"recId":"614095670"}],"person":[{"given":"Moritz Ludwig","role":"aut","display":"Schnitzer, Moritz Ludwig","roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn","family":"Schnitzer"},{"role":"aut","display":"Froelich, Matthias F.","given":"Matthias F.","roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn","family":"Froelich"},{"family":"Gassert","roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn","display":"Gassert, Felix","role":"aut","given":"Felix"},{"display":"Huber, Thomas","role":"aut","given":"Thomas","roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn","family":"Huber"},{"given":"Eva Kristina","display":"Gresser, Eva Kristina","role":"aut","roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn","family":"Gresser"},{"given":"Vincent","role":"aut","display":"Schwarze, Vincent","roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn","family":"Schwarze"},{"family":"Nörenberg","roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn","given":"Dominik","display":"Nörenberg, Dominik","role":"aut"},{"roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn","family":"Todica","display":"Todica, Andrei Stefan","role":"aut","given":"Andrei Stefan"},{"family":"Rübenthaler","roleDisplay":"VerfasserIn","given":"Johannes","display":"Rübenthaler, Johannes","role":"aut"}],"titleAlt":[{"title":"Follow-up 18 F-FDG PET/CT vs. contrast-enhanced CT after ablation of liver metastases of colorectal carcinoma"}],"recId":"1944965386"} 
SRT |a SCHNITZERMFOLLOWUP182720