Not duties but needs: rethinking refugeehood

In the scholarly debate, refugeehood is often understood to arise from a special need for basic protection, i.e., for protection of basic needs and rights. However, the main definitions of refugeehood shift to duties when aiming to develop this view. Either, refugees are defined as all those individ...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Mantel, Susanne (Autor)
Formato: Article (Journal)
Lenguaje:inglés
Publicado: June 2019
In: Journal of ethics & social philosophy
Year: 2019, Volumen: 15, Número: 2, Pages: 91-120
ISSN:1559-3061
DOI:10.26556/jesp.v15i2.483
Acceso en línea:Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v15i2.483
Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://jesp.org
Enlace del recurso
Notas de Autor:Susanne Mantel
Descripción
Sumario:In the scholarly debate, refugeehood is often understood to arise from a special need for basic protection, i.e., for protection of basic needs and rights. However, the main definitions of refugeehood shift to duties when aiming to develop this view. Either, refugees are defined as all those individuals who can receive basic protection from the international community, and thus arguably ought to be protected, or refugees are defined as all those to whom a special form of protection, namely protection by admission is owed. The paper argues that either definition is incompatible with a commonsense desideratum on consistent and plausible criteria for refugeehood, since these definitions imply that refugeehood depends partly on the capacities of protecting states and on the needs of third parties. Instead, refugeehood is defined by the need for basic protection and by flight aiming to remedy this condition.
Notas:Online veröfffenlticht: 6. Mai 2019
Gesehen am 23.12.2025
Descripción Física:Online Resource
ISSN:1559-3061
DOI:10.26556/jesp.v15i2.483