Evaluation of high-resolution WRF simulation in urban areas: effect of different physics schemes on simulation performance in the Rhine-Main-Neckar area
Quantifying and minimizing atmospheric transport errors is key to improve meteorological modeling and to better estimate urban greenhouse gas (GHG) and air pollution emissions from measurements. The Weather Research and Forecasting Model (WRF) model has been used to simulate urban atmospheric transp...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article (Journal) |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
January 2026
|
| In: |
Atmospheric research
Year: 2026, Volume: 328, Pages: 1-23 |
| ISSN: | 0169-8095 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.atmosres.2025.108435 |
| Online Access: | Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2025.108435 Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169809525005277 
|
| Author Notes: | Lukas Pilz, Christopher Lüken-Winkels, Michał Gałkowski, David Ho, Christoph Gerbig, Fei Chen, Sanam N. Vardag |
| Summary: | Quantifying and minimizing atmospheric transport errors is key to improve meteorological modeling and to better estimate urban greenhouse gas (GHG) and air pollution emissions from measurements. The Weather Research and Forecasting Model (WRF) model has been used to simulate urban atmospheric transport in many cities globally and there exist various possible configurations especially concerning choice of physics schemes, which influence the quality of the atmospheric simulation. Here, we conduct a comprehensive evaluation of WRF on 1km resolution for a polycentric European metropolitan area, namely the Rhine-Main-Neckar area by varying Land Surface Model (LSM), Surface Layer Model (SLM), Planetary Boundary Layer (PBL) and urban parametrization scheme configurations. We compare four month-long simulations to 2m temperature, 10m wind velocity and wind direction measured at 19 stations operated by the German Weather Service and to PBL height derived from radiosonde data at two locations. By showing kernel density functions in a Taylor diagram, we show the average performance of the schemes as well as the spread across different stations. We find that while the 2m temperature and PBL height performance are most sensitive to choice of urban parametrization scheme, 10m wind velocity and direction are most sensitive to choice of PBL scheme. Good overall performance was achieved using the Single-Layer Urban Canopy Model (SLUCM), Mellor-Yamada-Janjic (MYJ), Noah-Multiparametrization Land Surface Model (Noah-MP) and Monin-Obukhov (Janjic) (MO) schemes. While the ensemble spread is larger in winter than in summer, the choice of optimal scheme does not depend strongly on the season. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | Online verfügbar: 21. August 2025, Artikelversion: 02. September 2025 Gesehen am 21.01.2026 |
| Physical Description: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 0169-8095 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.atmosres.2025.108435 |