The management of psychiatric emergencies in Africa: a scoping review of restraint and seclusion practices in clinical settings and their impacts

More than 116 million people in Africa live with mental health conditions. However, many African countries lack the infrastructure, training and workforce to effectively manage psychiatric emergencies. This has led to overuse of controversial practices such as physical and chemical restraint and inv...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Chakkera, Shankar (Auteur) , Sieg, Julia (Auteur) , Khofi, Theodora (Auteur) , Ayieko, Rosemina (Auteur) , Knettel, Brandon A. (Auteur)
Format: Article (Journal)
Langue:anglais
Publié: 04 September 2025
In: Cambridge prisms. Global mental health
Year: 2025, Volume: 12, Pages: 1-12
ISSN:2054-4251
DOI:10.1017/gmh.2025.10052
Accès en ligne:Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2025.10052
Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/global-mental-health/article/management-of-psychiatric-emergencies-in-africa-a-scoping-review-of-restraint-and-seclusion-practices-in-clinical-settings-and-their-impacts/8E40CCEF906C50278E7CFE8A6FA8D0C6
Accéder au texte intégral
Notes sur l'auteur:Shankar Chakkera, Julia Sieg, Theodora Khofi, Rosemina Ayieko and Brandon A. Knettel
Description
Résumé:More than 116 million people in Africa live with mental health conditions. However, many African countries lack the infrastructure, training and workforce to effectively manage psychiatric emergencies. This has led to overuse of controversial practices such as physical and chemical restraint and involuntary seclusion, often violating patient rights. We conducted a scoping review of restraint and seclusion practices and their impacts in African clinical settings using the PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo and ProQuest databases. Titles/abstracts and full texts were reviewed for inclusion using the Covidence platform, and 29 studies were included in the final extraction. Restraint and/or seclusion were employed to manage aggression, enable involuntary treatment or prevent self-harm. Patients found restraint and seclusion to be dehumanizing, a cause of posttraumatic stress and a barrier to future help-seeking. Healthcare workers described inadequate training, overuse of restraint and seclusion, injuries and emotional distress after employing these treatments. Further research, intervention development and policy reform are urgently needed to promote humane and patient-centered psychiatric care, including verbal de-escalation training, in underresourced healthcare systems.
Description:Gesehen am 28.01.2026
Description matérielle:Online Resource
ISSN:2054-4251
DOI:10.1017/gmh.2025.10052