International Association of Pancreatology revised guidelines on acute pancreatitis 2025: supported and endorsed by the American Pancreatic Association, European Pancreatic Club, Indian Pancreas Club, and Japan Pancreas Society
Introduction - The International Association of Pancreatology, alongside the American Pancreatic Association, the European Pancreatic Club, the Indian Pancreas Club, and the Japan Pancreas Society, decided to update its earlier guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis (AP) given the remar...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article (Journal) |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
September 2025
|
| In: |
Pancreatology
Year: 2025, Volume: 25, Issue: 6, Pages: 770-814 |
| ISSN: | 1424-3911 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.pan.2025.04.020 |
| Online Access: | Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2025.04.020 Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1424390325000857 
|
| Author Notes: | IAP/APA/EPC/IPC/JPS Working Group* |
| Summary: | Introduction - The International Association of Pancreatology, alongside the American Pancreatic Association, the European Pancreatic Club, the Indian Pancreas Club, and the Japan Pancreas Society, decided to update its earlier guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis (AP) given the remarkable advances in our understanding of AP and its management over the last decade. - Methods - These organizations put together a group of international experts to address important issues related to the management of AP. Guideline Development Groups comprising international domain experts framed clinically relevant questions and conducted thorough literature searches and systematic reviews to address the questions. Questions were framed in the PICO (Participant, Intervention, Comparator, and Outcome) format where appropriate. The evidence from the literature was synthesized to develop evidence-based recommendations for each question. The quality of evidence and the strength of the recommendations were graded according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). For some questions, we have provided Good Practice Statements if enough direct evidence was unavailable. - Results - The guidelines pertain to 18 domains comprising 96 questions. The recommendations cover almost all aspects of managing AP, including pain control, fluid therapy, patient stabilization, nutritional support, conservative and interventional treatment for infected necrotizing pancreatitis, management of complications, discharge criteria, guidance on follow-up, and strategies for prevention of recurrence. Specific types of AP, such as those associated with pregnancy, trauma, and metabolic factors have been given special attention. - Conclusion - The recommendations presented here should serve as an evidence-based resource for practicing physicians and caregivers to treat patients with AP more effectively. In addition, the guidelines identify areas for future research, mainly targeted therapies for controlling systemic inflammation and mitigating organ dysfunction. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | Online verfügbar: 10. Juli 2025, Artikelversion: 22. September 2025 *IAP/APA/EPC/IPC/JPS Working Group: Andrea Párniczky, John Neoptolemos [und 92 weitere Personen] Gesehen am 20.02.2026 |
| Physical Description: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 1424-3911 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.pan.2025.04.020 |