Dissection with LigaSure Impact versus conventional resection in pylorus-preserving partial pancreatoduodenectomy (DISSECT): a single-institution randomized controlled trial
In partial pancreatoduodenectomy, appropriate effective hemostasis during dissection is of major importance for procedural flow, operation time, and postoperative outcome. As ligation, clipping, or suturing of blood vessels is time-consuming and numerous instrument changes are required, the primary...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article (Journal) |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
22. August 2020
|
| In: |
Langenbeck's archives of surgery
Year: 2020, Volume: 405, Issue: 7, Pages: 949-958 |
| ISSN: | 1435-2451 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s00423-020-01968-y |
| Online Access: | Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-020-01968-y Verlag, lizenzpflichtig, Volltext: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00423-020-01968-y |
| Author Notes: | Tobias Gehrig, V. Josef, A.T. Billeter, R. Warschkow, P. Knebel, C.N. Gutt, M.K. Diener, I. Tarantino |
| Summary: | In partial pancreatoduodenectomy, appropriate effective hemostasis during dissection is of major importance for procedural flow, operation time, and postoperative outcome. As ligation, clipping, or suturing of blood vessels is time-consuming and numerous instrument changes are required, the primary aim of this randomized controlled trial was to assess whether LigaSure Impact™ exhibits benefits over named conventional dissection techniques in patients undergoing pylorus-preserving partial pancreatoduodenectomy. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | Gesehen am 20.03.2026 |
| Physical Description: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 1435-2451 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s00423-020-01968-y |