A randomized controlled clinical trial of intranasal versus subcutaneous midazolam for agitation in terminal illness (MinTU study)
Background: Terminally ill patients often have difficulty taking medications. Suitable, minimally invasive, fast-acting administration routes are particularly important. Trials on alternative drug administration routes in palliative care are essential to base therapy decisions on evidence rather tha...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article (Journal) |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
March 22, 2026
|
| In: |
Palliative medicine
Year: 2026, Pages: 1-12 |
| ISSN: | 1477-030X |
| DOI: | 10.1177/02692163261428947 |
| Online Access: | Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163261428947 |
| Author Notes: | Hanna Hirschinger, Constanze Rémi, Evelyn Jäger, Stefanie Nittka, Svetlana Hetjens, Susanne Saussele, Kirsten Merx, Jan Koch, Mohammed Abba, Mahmoud Ghazal, Ralf-D Hofheinz, Thomas Michaeli, Elena Sperk, Katharina Kohlbrenner, Wolf-K Hofmann, Deniz Gencer and Tobias Boch |
| Summary: | Background: Terminally ill patients often have difficulty taking medications. Suitable, minimally invasive, fast-acting administration routes are particularly important. Trials on alternative drug administration routes in palliative care are essential to base therapy decisions on evidence rather than experience. - Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of intranasal compared with subcutaneous midazolam for the initial management of terminal agitation in palliative care patients. - Design: Randomized, investigator-initiated open-label phase-II trial, August 2022-July 2024. - Setting/Participants: Monocentric trial at the palliative care ward of a German University Hospital. 180 patients were assessed for suitability, 60 patients (median age, 68 years (SD 12.3), 26 female) were randomized 1:1 and analyzed. Patients with terminal agitation fulfilling all eligibility criteria were randomized to midazolam 5 mg administered either intranasal (n = 30) or subcutaneous (n = 30). Primary outcome: Improvement of terminal agitation by midazolam administration assessed by RASS-PAL-score. Secondary outcome: Midazolam plasma concentrations after administration. - Results: Median RASS-PAL-scores decreased significantly in both groups. Intranasal group: 2 at baseline, to -1 at 5 min and -2 at 20 min. Subcutaneous group: 1,-0 and -1. Within-group reductions exceeded the clinically relevant threshold of ⩾ 1 point at 5 and 20 min (all p < 0.0001). Median midazolam plasma concentrations were significantly higher intranasal (5 min: 90 ng/ml, 20 min: 83 ng/ml) than subcutaneous (5 min: 15 ng/ml, 20 min: 24 ng/ml). No patients withdrawn due to adverse effects. - Conclusion: Midazolam intranasal administration was effective in reducing terminal agitation and achieves higher plasma concentrations compared to subcutaneous administration. It is an alternative route of application to improve end-of-life care for terminally ill patients. - Trial Registration: MinTU Study 173-01, Eudra CT No.: 2021-004789-36, DRKS ID: 00026775 (07.07.2022, https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00026775). |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | Gesehen am 14.04.2026 |
| Physical Description: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 1477-030X |
| DOI: | 10.1177/02692163261428947 |