Influence of airway pressure release ventilation on pulmonary gas exchange using ventilatory ratio
BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic led to a surge in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) cases. Despite important advances in ventilation strategies, ARDS mortality remains high. Airway Pressure Release Ventilation (APRV), especially when used according to the Time-Controlled Adaptive Ventilatio...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article (Journal) |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
4 March 2026
|
| In: |
Frontiers in medicine
Year: 2026, Volume: 13, Pages: 1-9 |
| ISSN: | 2296-858X |
| DOI: | 10.3389/fmed.2026.1787967 |
| Online Access: | Resolving-System, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2026.1787967 Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/medicine/articles/10.3389/fmed.2026.1787967/full 
|
| Author Notes: | Emre Kiratlar, Patrick Rehn, Benjamin Neetz, Lars Reinhardt, Markus Alexander Weigand, Christoph Lichtenstern, Werner Schmidt, Armin Kalenka and Mascha O. Fiedler-Kalenka |
| Summary: | BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic led to a surge in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) cases. Despite important advances in ventilation strategies, ARDS mortality remains high. Airway Pressure Release Ventilation (APRV), especially when used according to the Time-Controlled Adaptive Ventilation (TCAV) protocol, has shown potential in improving oxygenation and reducing mortality in ARDS.MethodsThis retrospective dual-center study included patients with moderate to severe ARDS, who were treated with APRV or Low Tidal Volume Ventilation (LTVV) between January 2018 and March 2022. Individuals receiving APRV for at least 72 h after previously receiving LTVV were analyzed in further detail. PaO2/FiO2 ratio and Ventilatory Ratio (VR) were measured 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h after transition to APRV. Statistical analyses were performed using univariate repeated measures ANOVA and chi-squared test.ResultsOut of 107 patients, 48 received APRV. In 27 cases, APRV was applied according to TCAV-protocol. APRV was often used late in treatment or as a rescue therapy. Regarding the primary ventilation strategy, there was no significant difference in survival between APRV (44%) and LTVV (42%). In patients receiving APRV for at least 72 h after being initially ventilated with LTVV (n = 8), mean PaO2/FiO2 ratio improved significantly over time (p = 0.039), while mean VR decreased (p < 0.001).ConclusionAPRV demonstrated potential in improving gas exchange and ventilation efficiency in ARDS patients, particularly when used early and according to TCAV. However, no survival benefit was observed. The study’s retrospective design and heterogeneity in APRV application limit its conclusions. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | Gesehen am 13.07.2026 |
| Physical Description: | Online Resource |
| ISSN: | 2296-858X |
| DOI: | 10.3389/fmed.2026.1787967 |