Rethinking the link between cognitive control and emotion regulation: a meta-analytic review

Emotion regulation is essential for adaptive behavior and mental health. Dominant theoretical frameworks, together with influential neuroscientific accounts, suggest that emotion regulation is closely linked to cognitive control processes; however, behavioral evidence supporting this link remains in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Schulze, Katrin (Author) , Müller, Ilka (Author) , Holt, Daniel (Author) , Putz, Sam (Author) , Barnow, Sven (Author) , Prüßner, Luise (Author)
Format: Article (Journal)
Language:English
Published: September 2026
In: Neuroscience & biobehavioral reviews
Year: 2026, Volume: 188, Pages: 1-14
ISSN:1873-7528
DOI:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2026.106708
Online Access:Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2026.106708
Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014976342600165X
Get full text
Author Notes:Katrin Schulze, Ilka Mueller, Daniel V. Holt, Sam Putz, Sven Barnow, Luise Pruessner
Description
Summary:Emotion regulation is essential for adaptive behavior and mental health. Dominant theoretical frameworks, together with influential neuroscientific accounts, suggest that emotion regulation is closely linked to cognitive control processes; however, behavioral evidence supporting this link remains inconsistent. To quantify these associations, a comprehensive meta-analysis was conducted to examine the relationship between individual differences in cognitive control (updating, inhibition, shifting) and four emotion regulation strategies: reappraisal (k=70 studies, N=10,524), suppression (k=45, N=5,104), rumination (k=109, N=10,637), and worry (k=36, N=3,385). Individuals with stronger cognitive control abilities showed more frequent and more effective use of reappraisal and engaged less in rumination and worry, whereas suppression showed no consistent relation. Component-level analyses suggested associations with inhibition and updating, but not shifting, with stronger effects for regulation ability than for strategy use frequency. While all notable effects were conceptually consistent, their magnitudes were small (all |r| < .15), with estimates showing considerable heterogeneity and uncertainty. Overall, these findings suggest that the behavioral link between cognitive control and emotion regulation is weaker and more specific than commonly assumed, highlighting the need for more ecologically valid assessments of both cognitive control and emotion regulation.
Item Description:Online verfügbar: 30. April 2026, Artikelversion: 4. Juni 2026
Gesehen am 20.08.2026
Physical Description:Online Resource
ISSN:1873-7528
DOI:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2026.106708